Distributed solar renewable generation: Option contracts with renewable energy credit uncertainty

被引:25
作者
Zeng, Yaxiong [1 ]
Klabjan, Diego [1 ]
Arinez, Jorge [2 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Ind Engn & Management Sci, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[2] Gen Motors, Sustainable Mfg Syst, New York, NY USA
关键词
Real option; Renewable energy; Solar generation; REC market;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2014.12.013
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Solar energy is rapidly emerging thanks to the decreasing installation cost of solar panels and the renewable portfolio standard imposed by state governments, which gave birth to the Renewable Energy Credit (REC) and the Alternative Compliance Payment (ACP). To make profits from the REC market in addition to reduced energy costs, more and more home and business owners choose to install solar panels. Recently, third-party financing has become a common practice in solar panel investments. We discuss optimal timing for the host to potentially buy back the solar panels after being installed for a period of time and how to incorporate the optimal timing into a power purchase agreement between the host and the third-party developer. Because the REC price is a major source of uncertainty and also due to the ACP capping the REC price, we first propose a REC price forecasting model that specifically considers the ACP values. Then by a modified real option structure, we model the buyback contract as a real option and solve it with an approximate dynamic program based Monte Carlo simulation method. We find that as the ACP value increases, the value of the buyback option also increases under optimal timing. The method used does not only apply to solar projects but also to other distributed renewable projects that are third-party financed, such as wind generations. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 305
页数:11
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Amram M., 1999, REAL OPTIONS
  • [2] Ashuri B., 2011, REAL OPTIONS APPROAC
  • [3] The best time to invest in photovoltaic panels in Flanders
    Belien, Jeroen
    De Boeck, Liesje
    Colpaert, Jan
    Cooman, Gert
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2013, 50 : 348 - 358
  • [4] Dixit K., 1994, INVESTMENT UNCERTAIN
  • [5] Energy Information Administration, 2012, ANN EN REV 2011
  • [6] The use of real options approach in energy sector investments
    Fernandes, Bartolomeu
    Cunha, Jorge
    Ferreira, Paula
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2011, 15 (09) : 4491 - 4497
  • [7] Gourieroux C., 2004, PREPRINT
  • [8] Valuing American options by simulation: A simple least-squares approach
    Longstaff, FA
    Schwartz, ES
    [J]. REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2001, 14 (01) : 113 - 147
  • [9] Application of an advanced real options approach for renewable energy generation projects planning
    Martinez-Cesena, E. A.
    Mutale, J.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2011, 15 (04) : 2087 - 2094
  • [10] Assessment of domestic photovoltaic systems based on real options theory
    Martinez-Cesena, Eduardo Alejandro
    Azzopardi, Brian
    Mutale, Joseph
    [J]. PROGRESS IN PHOTOVOLTAICS, 2013, 21 (02): : 250 - 262