Determination of minor metal elements in steel using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy combined with machine learning algorithms

被引:45
作者
Zhang, Yuqing [1 ]
Sun, Chen [1 ]
Gao, Liang [1 ]
Yue, Zengqi [1 ]
Shabbir, Sahar [1 ]
Xu, Weijie [1 ]
Wu, Mengting [1 ]
Yu, Jin [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Phys & Astron, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Steels; Minor metal elements; LIBS; Spectral interference; Multivariate regression; Machine learning; TRACE-ELEMENTS; QUANTITATIVE-ANALYSIS; MULTIELEMENT ANALYSIS; STAINLESS-STEEL; ICP-MS; IRON; ABSORPTION; SPECTROMETRY; UNIVARIATE; ALLOYS;
D O I
10.1016/j.sab.2020.105802
中图分类号
O433 [光谱学];
学科分类号
0703 ; 070302 ;
摘要
The properties of a steel are crucially influenced by the contained minor elements, including metals, such as Mn, Cr and Ni. The determination of their concentrations using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) represents a great help in many application scenarios, especially with in situ and online measurement requirements. Such determination can be significantly perturbed by spectral interferences with Fe I and Fe II lines which is particularly dense in the VIS and near UV ranges. Univariate regression can sometimes, lead to calibration models with modest analytical performances. In this work, multivariate calibration models are developed using a machine learning approach. We first show the regression results with univariate models. The development of multivariate models is then briefly presented, in successive steps of data pretreatment, feature selection with SelectKBest algorithm and regression model training with back-propagation neural network (BPNN). The analytical performances obtained with the developed multivariate models are compared with those obtained with the univariate models. We demonstrate in such way, the efficiency of the machine learning approach in the development of multivariate models for calibration and prediction with LIBS spectra acquired from steel samples. In particular, the prediction trueness (relative error of prediction) and precision (relative standard deviation) for the determination of the above mentioned metal elements in steel reach the respective values of 1.13%, 2.85%, 7.20% (for Mn, Cr, Ni) and 6.68%, 3.96%, 6.52% (for Mn, Cr, Ni) with the used experimental condition and measurement protocol.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Development and application of portable, hand-held X-ray fluorescence spectrometers
    Bosco, Gerra L.
    [J]. TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2013, 45 : 121 - 134
  • [2] BROOK R, 1976, INT J FRACTURE, V12, P27
  • [3] Bruce P., 2017, Practical Statistics for Data Scientists: 50+ Essential Concepts Using R and Python
  • [4] Twelve different types of data normalization for the proposition of classification, univariate and multivariate regression models for the direct analyses of alloys by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS)
    Castro, Jeyne Pricylla
    Pereira-Filho, Edenir Rodrigues
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY, 2016, 31 (10) : 2005 - 2014
  • [5] Cormen Thomas H, 2001, INTRO ALGORITHMS
  • [6] Multi-element analysis of iron ore pellets by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy and principal components regression
    Death, D. L.
    Cunningham, A. P.
    Pollard, L. J.
    [J]. SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART B-ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY, 2008, 63 (07) : 763 - 769
  • [7] A guide to deep learning in healthcare
    Esteva, Andre
    Robicquet, Alexandre
    Ramsundar, Bharath
    Kuleshov, Volodymyr
    DePristo, Mark
    Chou, Katherine
    Cui, Claire
    Corrado, Greg
    Thrun, Sebastian
    Dean, Jeff
    [J]. NATURE MEDICINE, 2019, 25 (01) : 24 - 29
  • [8] ICP-MS - A powerful analytical technique for the analysis of traces of Sb, Bi, Pb, Sn and P in steel
    Finkeldei, S
    Staats, G
    [J]. FRESENIUS JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1997, 359 (4-5): : 357 - 360
  • [9] Grifoni E, 2015, SPECTROSCOPY-US, V30, P20
  • [10] Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
    He, Kaiming
    Zhang, Xiangyu
    Ren, Shaoqing
    Sun, Jian
    [J]. 2016 IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (CVPR), 2016, : 770 - 778