The impact of government policies on Nigeria economic growth (case of fiscal, monetary and trade policies)

被引:5
作者
Adegboyo, Olufemi Samuel [1 ]
Keji, Sunday Anderu [1 ]
Fasina, Oluwadamilola Tosin [1 ]
机构
[1] Fed Univ Oye Ekiti, Dept Econ, Oye Ekiti, Nigeria
关键词
Fiscal policy; Monetary policy; Trade policy; And economic growth;
D O I
10.1186/s43093-021-00104-6
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study examines the impact of fiscal, monetary and trade policies on Nigerian economic growth from 1985 to 2020. This study adopts endogenous growth model (AK model) as its theoretical framework. The unit root test results reveal that there is mixed level of stationarity in the variables. The bound test result shows that the variables cointegrate. The ARDL long-run result shows that fiscal policies stimulate economic growth, while on the contrary, trade policies deter Nigerian economic growth. The short-run result shows that the fiscal policies has an inconsistent impact on Nigerian economic growth and thus differs from the long-run result; while government spending continues to drive economic growth in Nigeria, government revenues have no effect on the growth of the economy. The result of the impact of monetary policies shows that interest rate impels growth of the economy while money supply deters growth of Nigeria's economy; lastly, the trade policies maintain her negative influence on the economy in both the long run and short run. Sequel to the findings, the study recommends the following: Policymakers should place more emphasis on using fiscal policy which was found to be stimulating the country's growth rate. Whenever it is expedient to use monetary policy to stimulate economic growth, policy makers should make use of interest rates as it stimulates the growth of the economy in the short run. The government should review her trade policies to reduce import by encouraging consumption of local products and motivate exporters of goods (raw material) to refine the products before exporting such.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] European monetary and fiscal policies after the EU enlargement
    Neck R.
    Haber G.
    McKibbin W.J.
    Empirica, 2004, 31 (2-3) : 229 - 245
  • [32] Threshold effects in monetary and fiscal policies in a growth model: Assessing the importance of the financial system
    Minea, Alexandru
    Villieu, Patrick
    JOURNAL OF MACROECONOMICS, 2009, 31 (02) : 304 - 319
  • [33] How to cushion economic recession caused by the COVID-19 pandemic: Fiscal or monetary policies?
    Wu, Ya
    Luo, Yu
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [34] The role of fiscal and monetary policies in the Brazilian economy: Understanding recent institutional reforms and economic changes
    Afonso, Jose Roberto
    Araujo, Eliane Cristina
    Fajardo, Bernardo Guelber
    QUARTERLY REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2016, 62 : 41 - 55
  • [35] Fiscal and monetary institutions and policies: onward and upward?
    Burdekin, Richard C. K.
    Banaian, King
    Hallerberg, Mark
    Siklos, Pierre L.
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMIC POLICY, 2011, 3 (04) : 340 - 354
  • [36] Strategic fiscal policies and leadership in a monetary union
    Chortareas, Georgios
    Mavrodimitrakis, Christos
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2017, 47 : 133 - 147
  • [37] Fiscal and monetary policies and the cost of sudden stops
    Hutchison, Michael M.
    Noy, Ilan
    Wang, Lidan
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MONEY AND FINANCE, 2010, 29 (06) : 973 - 987
  • [38] The COVID Health Crisis and the Fiscal and Monetary Policies in the Euro Area
    Ferreiro, Jesus
    Serrano, Felipe
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2021, 50 (03) : 212 - 225
  • [39] Explaining macroeconomic fluctuations in Ethiopia: the role of monetary and fiscal policies
    Alemu Lambamo Hawitibo
    Economic Change and Restructuring, 2023, 56 : 1033 - 1061
  • [40] THE COMMON MONETARY POLICY - DECENTRALIZED FISCAL POLICIES MIX FOR THE EUROZONE
    Socol, Cristian
    Marinas, Marius
    Socol, Aura Gabriela
    INTEGRATIVE RELATIONS BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND THE MEMBER STATES, VOL 3, 2008, : 393 - 397