Meta-analysis of the efficacy of ketamine in postoperative pain control in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing spinal fusion

被引:3
作者
Mariscal, Gonzalo [1 ,2 ]
Morales, Jorge [1 ,2 ]
Perez, Silvia [1 ,2 ]
Antonio Rubio-Belmar, Pedro [1 ,2 ]
Bovea-Marco, Miquel [1 ,2 ]
Bas, Jose Luis [1 ,2 ]
Bas, Paloma [1 ,2 ]
Bas, Teresa [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] La Fe Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg & Traumatol, Spine Unit, Avinguda Fernando Abril Martorell 106, Valencia 46026, Spain
[2] Polytech Hosp Valencia, Avinguda Fernando Abril Martorell 106, Valencia 46026, Spain
关键词
Ketamine; Pain control; Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Scoliosis; Spinal fusion; Meta-analysis; LOW-DOSE KETAMINE; CONTROLLED ANALGESIA; MORPHINE CONSUMPTION; EPIDURAL ANALGESIA; ADDING KETAMINE; SURGERY; REMIFENTANIL; HYPERALGESIA; INFUSION; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-022-07422-5
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose In this meta-analysis, we aim to compare ketamine use versus a control group (saline solution) during induction of anesthesia in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing fusion surgery in terms of postoperative opioid consumption, pain control, and side effects. Methods A PubMed search of studies published over the last 20 years using the descriptor/terms "ketamine AND scoliosis" was performed. Baseline characteristics of each article were obtained and efficacy measures analyzed (morphine equivalent treatment at 24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively, complications (vomiting/nausea and pruritus), length of hospital stay (days); and pain score (VAS)) (Review Manager 5.4 software package). Results Five randomized clinical trials were included. Morphine administration showed statistically significant differences at 24 and 48 h (MD - 0.15, 95% CI - 0.18 to - 0.12) and (MD - 0.26, 95% CI - 0.31 to - 0.21) between the ketamine and control (saline solution), respectively. No intergroup differences were found regarding nausea/vomiting and pruritus (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.67) and (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.62), respectively, same as for the pain score (MD - 0.75, 95% CI - 1.71 to 0.20). Conclusions The use intraoperative and postoperative continuous low doses of ketamine significantly reduces opioid use throughout the first 48 h in patients with AIS who undergo posterior spinal fusion.
引用
收藏
页码:3492 / 3499
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Abrishamkar Saeed, 2012, Med Arh, V66, P107
[2]   Postoperative analgesia with i.v. patient-controlled morphine: effect of adding ketamine [J].
Adriaenssens, G ;
Vermeyen, KM ;
Hoffmann, VLH ;
Mertens, E ;
Adriaensen, HF .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 83 (03) :393-396
[3]   Sex- and age-related differences in morphine requirements for postoperative pain relief [J].
Aubrun, F ;
Salvi, N ;
Coriat, P ;
Riou, B .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2005, 103 (01) :156-160
[4]  
Batra YK, 2007, INT J CLIN PHARM TH, V45, P155
[5]   Intraoperative low-close S-ketamine has no preventive effects on postoperative pain and morphine consumption after major urological surgery in children [J].
Becke, K ;
Albrecht, S ;
Schmitz, B ;
Rech, D ;
Koppert, W ;
Schüttler, J ;
Hering, W .
PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2005, 15 (06) :484-490
[6]  
Bennett GJ, 2000, J PAIN SYMPTOM MANAG, V19, pS2
[7]   PCA ketamine and morphine after abdominal hysterectomy [J].
Burstal, R ;
Danjoux, G ;
Hayes, C ;
Lantry, G .
ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2001, 29 (03) :246-251
[8]   Adding ketamine to morphine for intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for acute postoperative pain: a qualitative review of randomized trials [J].
Carstensen, M. ;
Moller, A. M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2010, 104 (04) :401-406
[9]   Development of acute opioid tolerance during infusion of remifentanil for pediatric scoliosis surgery [J].
Crawford, MW ;
Hickey, C ;
Zaarour, C ;
Howard, A ;
Naser, B .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2006, 102 (06) :1662-1667
[10]   Ketamine for perioperative pain management in children: a meta-analysis of published studies [J].
Dahmani, Souhayl ;
Michelet, Daphne ;
Abback, Paer-Selim ;
Wood, Chantal ;
Brasher, Christopher ;
Nivoche, Yves ;
Mantz, Jean .
PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2011, 21 (06) :636-652