A Novel Urine Exosome Gene Expression Assay to Predict High-grade Prostate Cancer at Initial Biopsy

被引:473
作者
McKiernan, James [2 ]
Donovan, Michael J. [1 ]
O'Neill, Vince [3 ]
Bentink, Stefan [3 ]
Noerholm, Mikkel [3 ]
Belzer, Susan [3 ]
Skog, Johan [3 ]
Kattan, Michael W. [4 ]
Partin, Alan [5 ]
Andriole, Gerald [6 ]
Brown, Gordon [7 ]
Wei, John T. [8 ]
Thompson, Ian M., Jr. [9 ]
Carroll, Peter [10 ]
机构
[1] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Pathol, 1468 Madison Ave, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Dept Urol, New York, NY USA
[3] Exosome Diagnost, Cambridge, MA USA
[4] Cleveland Clin, Dept Quantitat Hlth Sci, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[6] Washington Univ, Div Urol Surg, St Louis, MO USA
[7] Delaware Valley Urol, Voorhees, NJ USA
[8] Univ Michigan, Div Urol Surg, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[9] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, Canc Therapy & Res Ctr, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[10] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Urol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; MESSENGER-RNA; PCA3; ERG; MEN; MORTALITY; RECOMMENDATION; PROGRESSION; BIOMARKERS;
D O I
10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.0097
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of indolent prostate cancer (PCA) is a serious health issue in most developed countries. There is an unmet clinical need for noninvasive, easy to administer, diagnostic assays to help assess whether a prostate biopsy is warranted. OBJECTIVE To determine the performance of a novel urine exosome gene expression assay (the ExoDx Prostate IntelliScore urine exosome assay) plus standard of care (SOC) (ie, prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level, age, race, and family history) vs SOC alone for discriminating between Gleason score (GS) 7 and GS6 and benign disease on initial biopsy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In training, using reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (PCR), we compared the urine exosome gene expression assay with biopsy outcomes in 499 patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels of 2 to 20 ng/mL. The derived prognostic score was then validated in 1064 patients from 22 community practice and academic urology clinic sites in the United States. Eligible participants included PCA-free men, 50 years or older, scheduled for an initial or repeated prostate needle biopsy due to suspicious digital rectal examination (DRE) findings and/or PSA levels (limit range, 2.0-20.0 ng/mL). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Evaluate the assay using the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) in discrimination of GS7 or greater from GS6 and benign disease on initial biopsy. RESULTS In 255 men in the training target population (median age 62 years and median PSA level 5.0 ng/mL, and initial biopsy), the urine exosome gene expression assay plus SOC was associated with improved discrimination between GS7 or greater and GS6 and benign disease: AUC 0.77 (95% CI, 0.71-0.83) vs SOC AUC 0.66 (95% CI, 0.58-0.72) (P < .001). Independent validation in 519 patients' urine exosome gene expression assay plus SOC AUC 0.73 (95% CI, 0.68-0.77) was superior to SOC AUC 0.63 (95% CI, 0.58-0.68) (P < .001). Using a predefined cut point, 138 of 519 (27%) biopsies would have been avoided, missing only 5% of patients with dominant pattern 4 high-risk GS7 disease. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This urine exosome gene expression assay is a noninvasive, urinary 3-gene expression assay that discriminates high-grade (>= GS7) from low-grade (GS6) cancer and benign disease. In this study, the urine exosome gene expression assay was associated with improved identification of patients with higher-grade prostate cancer among men with elevated PSA levels and could reduce the total number of unnecessary biopsies.
引用
收藏
页码:882 / 889
页数:8
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] Abouassaly R, 2012, CAMPBELL WALSH UROLO, V10
  • [2] Gleason Score 7 Prostate Cancer on Needle Biopsy: Relation of Primary Pattern 3 or 4 to Pathological Stage and Progression After Radical Prostatectomy
    Amin, Ali
    Partin, Alan
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 186 (04) : 1286 - 1290
  • [3] Mortality Results from a Randomized Prostate-Cancer Screening Trial
    Andriole, Gerald L.
    Grubb, Robert L., III
    Buys, Saundra S.
    Chia, David
    Church, Timothy R.
    Fouad, Mona N.
    Gelmann, Edward P.
    Kvale, Paul A.
    Reding, Douglas J.
    Weissfeld, Joel L.
    Yokochi, Lance A.
    Crawford, E. David
    O'Brien, Barbara
    Clapp, Jonathan D.
    Rathmell, Joshua M.
    Riley, Thomas L.
    Hayes, Richard B.
    Kramer, Barnett S.
    Izmirlian, Grant
    Miller, Anthony B.
    Pinsky, Paul F.
    Prorok, Philip C.
    Gohagan, John K.
    Berg, Christine D.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 360 (13) : 1310 - 1319
  • [4] [Anonymous], EUR UROL
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2013, GLOBOCAN 2012 ESTIMA
  • [6] Effect of the USPSTF Grade D Recommendation against Screening for Prostate Cancer on Incident Prostate Cancer Diagnoses in the United States
    Barocas, Daniel A.
    Mallin, Katherine
    Graves, Amy J.
    Penson, David F.
    Palis, Bryan
    Winchester, David P.
    Chang, Sam S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 194 (06) : 1587 - 1593
  • [7] When is Prostate Cancer Really Cancer?
    Berman, David M.
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    [J]. UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2014, 41 (02) : 339 - 346
  • [8] Impact of the US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations against Prostate Specific Antigen Screening on Prostate Biopsy and Cancer Detection Rates
    Bhindi, Bimal
    Mamdani, Muhammad
    Kulkarni, Girish S.
    Finelli, Antonio
    Hamilton, Robert J.
    Trachtenberg, John
    Zlotta, Alexandre R.
    Evans, Andrew
    van der Kwast, Theodorus H.
    Toi, Ants
    Fleshner, Neil E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (05) : 1519 - 1524
  • [9] Radical Prostatectomy or Watchful Waiting in Early Prostate Cancer
    Bill-Axelson, Anna
    Holmberg, Lars
    Garmo, Hans
    Rider, Jennifer R.
    Taari, Kimmo
    Busch, Christer
    Nordling, Stig
    Haggman, Michael
    Andersson, Swen-Olof
    Spangberg, Anders
    Andren, Ove
    Palmgren, Juni
    Steineck, Gunnar
    Adami, Hans-Olov
    Johansson, Jan-Erik
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2014, 370 (10) : 932 - 942
  • [10] Optimization of Prostate Biopsy Review of Technique and Complications
    Bjurlin, Marc A.
    Wysock, James S.
    Taneja, Samir S.
    [J]. UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2014, 41 (02) : 299 - +