共 50 条
Systematic review of EASY-care needs assessment for community-dwelling older people
被引:34
|作者:
Craig, Christopher
[1
]
Chadborn, Neil
[1
]
Sands, Gina
[1
]
Tuomainen, Helena
[2
]
Gladman, John
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Nottingham, CLAHRC East Midlands, Natl Inst Hlth Res, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[2] Univ Warwick, Div Mental Hlth & Well Being, Warwick Med Sch, Warwick, England
基金:
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词:
EASY-Care;
geriatric assessment;
needs assessment;
systematic review;
older people;
ELDERLY-PEOPLE;
IDENTIFICATION;
RELIABILITY;
INSTRUMENT;
VALIDITY;
NURSES;
HEALTH;
D O I:
10.1093/ageing/afv050
中图分类号:
R592 [老年病学];
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号:
03 ;
0303 ;
100203 ;
摘要:
Objective: to review the evidence of reliability, validity and acceptability of EASY-Care and its appropriateness for assessing the needs of community-dwelling older people. Methods: systematic search of literature databases using pre-defined search terms (January 1994-May 2014) for English language articles reporting on the reliability, validity, acceptability and implementation of EASY-Care in primary care and community settings. Eligible articles were critically reviewed. Discussion papers mapping professionals' use of the tool were also included as these could be considered an aspect of validity. Results: twenty-nine papers met the inclusion criteria and underwent data extraction. A narrative synthesis was performed, because there was a variety of quantitative and qualitative outcomes and characteristics. Reliability evidence for EASY-Care is minimal. Evidence for validity is good, and it has received numerous positive endorsements of acceptability in international settings from older people and practitioners. Conclusion: evidence supports the use of EASY-Care for individual needs assessment; further research is needed for other uses. Of the papers that made statements about who should administer EASY-Care, the majority indicated that nurses were preferable to self-completion.
引用
收藏
页码:559 / 565
页数:7
相关论文