Establishing the learning curve of transanal minimally invasive surgery for local excision of rectal neoplasms

被引:42
作者
Lee, Lawrence [1 ]
Kelly, Justin [1 ]
Nassif, George J. [1 ]
Keller, Deborah [2 ]
Debeche-Adams, Teresa C. [1 ]
Mancuso, Paul A. [1 ]
Monson, John R. [1 ]
Albert, Matthew R. [1 ]
Atallah, Sam B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Florida Hosp, Ctr Colon & Rectal Surg, Dept Surg, 2501 North Orange Ave,Suite 240, Orlando, FL 32804 USA
[2] Baylor Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Dallas, TX 75246 USA
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2018年 / 32卷 / 03期
关键词
Transanal minimally invasive surgery; Local excision; Learning curve; ENDOSCOPIC MICROSURGERY; CANCER; OUTCOMES; ADENOCARCINOMA; COMPETENCE; RESECTION; MODEL; TAMIS;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-017-5817-1
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) is an endoscopic operating platform for local excision of rectal neoplasms. However, it may be technically demanding, and its learning curve has yet to be adequately defined. The objective of this study was to determine the number of TAMIS procedures for the local excision of rectal neoplasm required to reach proficiency. Methods and procedures All TAMIS cases performed from 07/2009 to 12/2016 at a single high-volume tertiary care institution for local excision of benign and malignant rectal neoplasia were identified from a prospective database. A cumulative summation (CUSUM) analysis was performed to determine the number of cases required to reach proficiency. The main proficiency outcome was rate of margin positivity (R1 resection). The acceptable and unacceptable R1 rates were defined as the R1 rate of transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM-10%) and traditional transanal excision (TAE-26%), which was obtained from previously published meta-analyses. Comparisons of patient, tumor, and operative characteristics before and after TAMIS proficiency were performed. Results A total of 254 TAMIS procedures were included in this study. The overall R1 resection rate was 7%. The indication for TAMIS was malignancy in 57%. CUSUM analysis reported that TAMIS reached an acceptable R1 rate between 14 and 24 cases. Moving average plots also showed that the mean operative times stabilized by proficiency gain. The mean lesion size was larger after proficiency gain (3.0 cm (SD 1.5) vs. 2.3 cm (SD 1.3), p = 0.008). All other patient, tumor, and operative characteristics were similar before and after proficiency gain. Conclusions TAMIS for local excision of rectal neoplasms is a complex procedure that requires a minimum of 14-24 cases to reach an acceptable R1 resection rate and lower operative duration.
引用
收藏
页码:1368 / 1376
页数:9
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS) for Local Excision of Benign Neoplasms and Early-stage Rectal Cancer: Efficacy and Outcomes in the First 50 Patients [J].
Albert, Matthew R. ;
Atallah, Sam B. ;
deBeche-Adams, Teresa C. ;
Izfar, Seema ;
Larach, Sergio W. .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2013, 56 (03) :301-307
[2]   Modern Rectal Cancer Multidisciplinary Treatment: The Role of Radiation and Surgery [J].
Allaix, Marco E. ;
Fichera, Alessandro .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 20 (09) :2921-2928
[3]   Systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus transanal endoscopic microsurgery for large noninvasive rectal lesions [J].
Arezzo, Alberto ;
Passera, Roberto ;
Saito, Yutaka ;
Sakamoto, Taku ;
Kobayashi, Nozomu ;
Sakamoto, Naoto ;
Yoshida, Naohisa ;
Naito, Yuji ;
Fujishiro, Mitsuhiro ;
Niimi, Keiko ;
Ohya, Tomohiko ;
Ohata, Ken ;
Okamura, Shinichi ;
Iizuka, Shinei ;
Takeuchi, Yoji ;
Uedo, Noriya ;
Fusaroli, Pietro ;
Bonino, Marco Augusto ;
Verra, Mauro ;
Morino, Mario .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2014, 28 (02) :427-438
[4]   Transanal minimally invasive surgery for total mesorectal excision (TAMIS-TME): results and experience with the first 20 patients undergoing curative-intent rectal cancer surgery at a single institution [J].
Atallah, S. ;
Martin-Perez, B. ;
Albert, M. ;
deBeche-Adams, T. ;
Nassif, G. ;
Hunter, L. ;
Larach, S. .
TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2014, 18 (05) :473-480
[5]   Why the Conventional Parks Transanal Excision for Early Stage Rectal Cancer Should Be Abandoned [J].
Atallah, Sam ;
Keller, Deborah .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2015, 58 (12) :1211-1214
[6]   Transanal minimally invasive surgery: a giant leap forward [J].
Atallah, Sam ;
Albert, Matthew ;
Larach, Sergio .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2010, 24 (09) :2200-2205
[7]   Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) versus transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM): Is one better than the other? [J].
Atallah, Sam B. ;
Albert, Matthew R. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 27 (12) :4750-4751
[8]   Perforation into the peritoneal cavity during transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer is not associated with major complications or oncological compromise [J].
Baatrup, Gunnar ;
Borschitz, Thomas ;
Cunningham, Christoffer ;
Qvist, Niels .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2009, 23 (12) :2680-2683
[9]   A predictive model for local recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer [J].
Bach, S. P. ;
Hill, J. ;
Monson, J. R. T. ;
Simson, J. N. L. ;
Lane, L. ;
Merrie, A. ;
Warren, B. ;
Mortensens, N. J. McC. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 96 (03) :280-290
[10]   Colorectal surgeons' learning curve of transanal endoscopic microsurgery [J].
Barendse, Renee M. ;
Dijkgraaf, Marcel G. ;
Rolf, Ursula R. ;
Bijnen, Arnold B. ;
Consten, Esther C. J. ;
Hoff, Christiaan ;
Dekker, Evelien ;
Fockens, Paul ;
Bemelman, Willem A. ;
de Graaf, Eelco J. R. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 27 (10) :3591-3602