The knowledge mobility of Renewable Energy Technology

被引:7
作者
Persoon, P. G. J. [1 ]
Bekkers, R. N. A. [1 ]
Alkemade, F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Sch Innovat Sci, Eindhoven, Netherlands
基金
荷兰研究理事会;
关键词
Renewable energy technology; Knowledge base; Geography; Patents; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; SCHUMPETERIAN PATTERNS; INNOVATION SYSTEMS; SPILLOVERS; EVOLUTION; SECTOR; MODES; BASES;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112670
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In the race to achieve climate goals, many governments and organizations are encouraging the local development of Renewable Energy Technology (RET). The spatial innovation dynamics of the development of a technology partly depends on the characteristics of the knowledge base on which this technology builds, in particular the analyticity and cumulativeness of knowledge. Theoretically, greater analyticity and lesser cumulativeness are positively associated with more widespread development. In this study, we first empirically evaluate these relations for general technology and then systematically determine the knowledge base characteristics for a set of 14 different RETs. We find that, while several RETs (photovoltaics, fuel cells, energy storage) have a highly analytic knowledge base and develop more widespread, there are also important RETs (wind turbines, solar thermal, geothermal, and hydro energy) for which the knowledge base is less analytic and which develop less widespread. Likewise, the technological cumulativeness tends to be lower for the former than for the latter group. This calls for regional and country-level policies to be specific for different RETs, taking for a given RET into account both the type of knowledge it builds on as well as the local presence of this knowledge.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Global energy transformation: A roadmap to 2050, V2019
[2]   Knowledge space oddity: How to increase the intensity and relevance of the technological progress of European regions [J].
Apa, Roberta ;
De Noni, Ivan ;
Orsi, Luigi ;
Sedita, Silvia Rita .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2018, 47 (09) :1700-1712
[3]  
Asheim BT, 2016, HANDBOOK ON THE GEOGRAPHIES OF INNOVATION, P45
[4]   Constructing Regional Advantage: Platform Policies Based on Related Variety and Differentiated Knowledge Bases [J].
Asheim, Bjorn T. ;
Boschma, Ron ;
Cooke, Philip .
REGIONAL STUDIES, 2011, 45 (07) :893-904
[5]   Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters [J].
Asheim, BT ;
Coenen, L .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2005, 34 (08) :1173-1190
[6]   The Geography of Complex Knowledge [J].
Balland, Pierre-Alexandre ;
Rigby, David .
ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 93 (01) :1-23
[7]   Knowledge sources and impacts on subsequent inventions: Do green technologies differ from non-green ones? [J].
Barbieri, Nicole ;
Marzucchi, Alberto ;
Rizzo, Ugo .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2020, 49 (02)
[8]  
Barros VR, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT B: REGIONAL ASPECTS, P1133
[9]   The relationship between basic and applied research in universities [J].
Bentley, Peter James ;
Gulbrandsen, Magnus ;
Kyvik, Svein .
HIGHER EDUCATION, 2015, 70 (04) :689-709
[10]   Global Innovation Systems-A conceptual framework for innovation dynamics in transnational contexts [J].
Binz, Christian ;
Truffer, Bernhard .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2017, 46 (07) :1284-1298