De novo identification of differentially methylated regions in the human genome

被引:639
|
作者
Peters, Timothy J. [1 ]
Buckley, Michael J. [1 ]
Statham, Aaron L. [2 ]
Pidsley, Ruth [2 ]
Samaras, Katherine [3 ]
Lord, Reginald V. [4 ]
Clark, Susan J. [2 ,5 ]
Molloy, Peter L. [6 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO, Digital Prod Flagship, Riverside Life Sci Ctr, N Ryde, NSW 2113, Australia
[2] Garvan Inst Med Res, Epigenet Program, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] St Vincents Hosp, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia
[4] Univ Notre Dame, Sch Med, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia
[5] Univ New S Wales, Fac Med, St Vincents Clin Sch, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia
[6] CSIRO, Food & Nutr Flagship, Riverside Life Sci Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Differential DNA methylation; Kernel smoothing; Illumina; DNA METHYLATION; CANCER GENOME; R PACKAGE; ILLUMINA; ARRAY; REGRESSION; DISCOVERY; VALIDATION; TISSUES;
D O I
10.1186/1756-8935-8-6
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Background: The identification and characterisation of differentially methylated regions (DMRs) between phenotypes in the human genome is of prime interest in epigenetics. We present a novel method, DMRcate, that fits replicated methylation measurements from the Illumina HM450K BeadChip (or 450K array) spatially across the genome using a Gaussian kernel. DMRcate identifies and ranks the most differentially methylated regions across the genome based on tunable kernel smoothing of the differential methylation (DM) signal. The method is agnostic to both genomic annotation and local change in the direction of the DM signal, removes the bias incurred from irregularly spaced methylation sites, and assigns significance to each DMR called via comparison to a null model. Results: We show that, for both simulated and real data, the predictive performance of DMRcate is superior to those of Bumphunter and Probe Lasso, and commensurate with that of comb-p. For the real data, we validate all array-derived DMRs from the candidate methods on a suite of DMRs derived from whole-genome bisulfite sequencing called from the same DNA samples, using two separate phenotype comparisons. Conclusions: The agglomeration of genomically localised individual methylation sites into discrete DMRs is currently best served by a combination of DM-signal smoothing and subsequent threshold specification. The findings also suggest the design of the 450K array shows preference for CpG sites that are more likely to be differentially methylated, but its overall coverage does not adequately reflect the depth and complexity of methylation signatures afforded by sequencing. For the convenience of the research community we have created a user-friendly R software package called DMRcate, downloadable from Bioconductor and compatible with existing preprocessing packages, which allows others to apply the same DMR-finding method on 450K array data.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] De novo identification of differentially methylated regions in the human genome
    Timothy J Peters
    Michael J Buckley
    Aaron L Statham
    Ruth Pidsley
    Katherine Samaras
    Reginald V Lord
    Susan J Clark
    Peter L Molloy
    Epigenetics & Chromatin, 8
  • [2] Identification of Imprinted Genes and Their Differentially Methylated Regions in Porcine
    Yin, Z.
    Zhang, X.
    Li, J.
    Jiao, Y.
    Kong, Q.
    Mu, Y.
    RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF GENETICS, 2019, 55 (12) : 1488 - 1498
  • [3] Differentially methylated regions in T cells identify kidney transplant patients at risk for de novo skin cancer
    Peters, Fleur S.
    Peeters, Annemiek M. A.
    Mandaviya, Pooja R.
    van Meurs, Joyce B. J.
    Hofland, Leo J.
    van de Wetering, Jacqueline
    Betjes, Michiel G. H.
    Baan, Carla C.
    Boer, Karin
    CLINICAL EPIGENETICS, 2018, 10 : 81
  • [4] Differentially methylated regions in T cells identify kidney transplant patients at risk for de novo skin cancer
    Fleur S. Peters
    Annemiek M. A. Peeters
    Pooja R. Mandaviya
    Joyce B. J. van Meurs
    Leo J. Hofland
    Jacqueline van de Wetering
    Michiel G. H. Betjes
    Carla C. Baan
    Karin Boer
    Clinical Epigenetics, 2018, 10
  • [5] Gbdmr: identifying differentially methylated CpG regions in the human genome via generalized beta regressions
    Chengzhou Wu
    Xichen Mou
    Hongmei Zhang
    BMC Bioinformatics, 25
  • [6] Gbdmr: identifying differentially methylated CpG regions in the human genome via generalized beta regressions
    Wu, Chengzhou
    Mou, Xichen
    Zhang, Hongmei
    BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [7] A Novel Method for Identification and Quantification of Consistently Differentially Methylated Regions
    Hsiao, Ching-Lin
    Hsieh, Ai-Ru
    Lian, Ie-Bin
    Lin, Ying-Chao
    Wang, Hui-Min
    Fann, Cathy S. J.
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (05):
  • [8] QDMR: a quantitative method for identification of differentially methylated regions by entropy
    Zhang, Yan
    Liu, Hongbo
    Lv, Jie
    Xiao, Xue
    Zhu, Jiang
    Liu, Xiaojuan
    Su, Jianzhong
    Li, Xia
    Wu, Qiong
    Wang, Fang
    Cui, Ying
    NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2011, 39 (09) : e58
  • [9] Assessing genome-wide significance for the detection of differentially methylated regions
    Page, Christian M.
    Vos, Linda
    Rounge, Trine B.
    Harbo, Hanne F.
    Andreassen, Bettina K.
    STATISTICAL APPLICATIONS IN GENETICS AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2018, 17 (05)
  • [10] Identification of Lung Cancer Specific Differentially Methylated Regions Using Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Study
    Hong, Y.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2017, 12 (11) : S1949 - S1949