Climate change mitigation potential of Norwegian households and the rebound effect

被引:62
作者
Bjelle, Eivind Lekve [1 ]
Steen-Olsen, Kjartan [1 ]
Wood, Richard [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Energy & Proc Engn, Ind Ecol Programme, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
Rebound effect; Carbon footprint; 2 degrees C target; Input-output analysis; Re-spending; Sustainable lifestyles; SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION; CARBON; CONSUMERS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.089
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
An increasing number of studies show that efficiency improvements alone will not be sufficient to attain the substantial emission reductions needed to mitigate global warming to a target of 2 degrees C. Consumption side changes are likely to be needed to achieve sufficient emission reductions. The United Nations emphasize the importance of developed countries taking the lead in lowering emissions to achieve the sustainable development goals. This paper assess to what extent Norwegian households can lower their carbon footprint consistent with territorial emission reductions towards the 2 degrees C target of global warming through implementing a set of behavioral actions. We evaluate the efficacy of the set of actions both initially and after considering rebound effects. A multiregional environmentally extended input-output database is linked with the Norwegian consumer expenditure survey to analyze both average and marginal expenditure per unit of increased income. Further, linear programming is applied to examine the changes needed by households to reach different emission reduction targets. We find that households implementing the full set of actions without re-spending can obtain a 58% decrease in their carbon footprint. When accounting for the effect of re-spending, this reduction drops to 24-35%, which is not within the requirements of the 2 degrees C target. The optimization analysis suggests households can achieve reductions up to 45% by restricting re-spending to specific goods and services. This indicates that curbing the rebound effect is key to achieving real reductions in household carbon footprints. We show that changing consumption patterns can significantly contribute to lowering anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions without compromising the level of economic activity. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:208 / 217
页数:10
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] The sufficiency strategy: Would rich-world frugality lower environmental impact?
    Alcott, Blake
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 64 (04) : 770 - 786
  • [2] Green consumption-no solution for climate change
    Alfredsson, EC
    [J]. ENERGY, 2004, 29 (04) : 513 - 524
  • [3] Briceno Tania, 2005, USING LIFE CYCLE APP
  • [4] Living up to expectations: Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for UK households
    Chitnis, Mona
    Sorrell, Steve
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2015, 52 : S100 - S116
  • [5] Who rebounds most? Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for different UK socioeconomic groups
    Chitnis, Mona
    Sorrell, Steve
    Druckman, Angela
    Firth, Steven K.
    Jackson, Tim
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 106 : 12 - 32
  • [6] Turning lights into flights: Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for UK households
    Chitnis, Mona
    Sorrell, Steve
    Druckman, Angela
    Firth, Steven K.
    Jackson, Tim
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 55 : 234 - 250
  • [7] Evolution of the global sustainable consumption and production policy and the United Nations Environment Programme's (UNEP) supporting activities
    Clark, Garrette
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2007, 15 (06) : 492 - 498
  • [8] Consumption-based accounting of CO2 emissions
    Davis, Steven J.
    Caldeira, Ken
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2010, 107 (12) : 5687 - 5692
  • [9] Denstadli J.M., 2012, REISEVANER PA FLY 20
  • [10] Missing carbon reductions? Exploring rebound and backfire effects in UK households
    Druckman, Angela
    Chitnis, Mona
    Sorrell, Steve
    Jackson, Tim
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (06) : 3572 - 3581