Conservation Agriculture Practices in Rainfed Uplands of India Improve Maize-Based System Productivity and Profitability

被引:12
|
作者
Pradhan, Aliza [1 ]
Idol, Travis [1 ]
Roul, Pravat K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hawaii Manoa, Dept Nat Resources & Environm Management, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
[2] Orissa Univ Agr & Technol, Directorate Planning Monitoring & Evaluat, Bhuvaneswar, India
来源
FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE | 2016年 / 7卷
关键词
rainfed uplands; system productivity; maize equivalent yield; dominance analysis; INTERCROPPING SYSTEMS; SOIL; DENSITY; YIELD; TILLAGE; AFRICA; WHEAT;
D O I
10.3389/fpls.2016.01008
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Traditional agriculture in rainfed uplands of India has been experiencing low agricultural productivity as the lands suffer from poor soil fertility, susceptibility to water erosion and other external pressures of development and climate change. A shift towards more sustainable cropping systems such as conservation agriculture production systems (CAPS) may help in maintaining soil quality as well as improving crop production and farmers net economic benefit. This research assessed the effects over three years (2011-2014) of reduced tillage, intercropping, and cover cropping practices customized for maize-based production systems in upland areas of Odisha, India. The study focused on crop yield, system productivity and profitability through maize equivalent yield and dominance analysis. Results showed that maize grain yield did not differ significantly over time or among CAPS treatments while cowpea yield was considered as an additional yield in intercropping systems. Mustard and horsegram grown in plots after maize cowpea intercropping recorded higher grain yields of 25 and 37%, respectively, as compared to those without intercropping. Overall, the full CAPS implementation i.e. minimum tillage, maize-cowpea intercropping and mustard residue retention had significantly higher system productivity and net benefits than traditional farmer practices, i.e. conventional tillage, sole maize cropping, and no mustard residue retention. The dominance analysis demonstrated increasing benefits of combining conservation practices that exceeded thresholds for farmer adoption. Given the use of familiar crops and technologies and the magnitude of yield and income improvements, these types of CAPS should be acceptable and attractive for smallholder farmers in the area. This in turn should support a move toward sustainable intensification of crop production to meet future household income and nutritional needs.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Maize-based conservation agriculture systems in Malawi: Long-term trends in productivity
    Thierfelder, Christian
    Chisui, John L.
    Gama, Mphatso
    Cheesman, Stephanie
    Jere, Zwide D.
    Bunderson, W. Trent
    Eash, Neal S.
    Rusinamhodzi, Leonard
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2013, 142 : 47 - 57
  • [2] Conservation agriculture and precision nutrient management practices in maize-wheat system: Effects on crop and water productivity and economic profitability
    Jat, R. D.
    Jat, H. S.
    Nanwal, R. K.
    Yadav, A. K.
    Bana, Anil
    Choudhary, K. M.
    Kakraliya, S. K.
    Sutaliya, J. M.
    Sapkota, Tek B.
    Jat, M. L.
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2018, 222 : 111 - 120
  • [3] Conservation agriculture in irrigated intensive maize-based systems of north-western India: Effects on crop yields, water productivity and economic profitability
    Parihar, C. M.
    Jat, S. L.
    Singh, A. K.
    Kumar, B.
    Yadvinder-Singh
    Pradhan, S.
    Pooniya, V.
    Dhauja, A.
    Chaudhary, V.
    Jat, M. L.
    Jat, R. K.
    Yadav, O. P.
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2016, 193 : 104 - 116
  • [4] Enhancing Energetics, System Productivity, Profitability and Soil Fertility in Maize Based Cropping System by Conservation vis a vis Conventional Agriculture in North-West India
    Tripathi, S. C.
    Kumar, Nitesh
    Venkatesh, Karnam
    Meena, R. P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT PRODUCTION, 2025, 19 (01) : 117 - 130
  • [5] Effect of conservation agriculture on maize-based farming system in the mid-hills of Nepal
    Paudel, Bikash
    Radovich, Theodore J. K.
    Chan-Halbrendt, Catherine
    Crow, Susan
    Tamang, B. B.
    Halbrendt, Jacqueline
    Thapa, Keshab
    HUMANITARIAN TECHNOLOGY: SCIENCE, SYSTEMS AND GLOBAL IMPACT 2014, (HUMTECH2014), 2014, 78 : 327 - 336
  • [6] Contribution of Cover Crops to the Productivity of Maize-Based Conservation Agriculture Systems in Zimbabwe
    Mhlanga, Blessing
    Cheesman, Stephanie
    Maasdorp, Barbara
    Mupangwa, Walter
    Thierfelder, Christian
    CROP SCIENCE, 2015, 55 (04) : 1791 - 1805
  • [7] Crop and Residue Management Improves Productivity and Profitability of Rice-Maize System in Salt-Affected Rainfed Lowlands of East India
    Sarangi, Sukanta K.
    Singh, Sudhanshu
    Srivastava, Ashish K.
    Choudhary, Madhu
    Mandal, Uttam K.
    Lama, Tashi D.
    Mahanta, Kshirendra K.
    Kumar, Virender
    Sharma, Parbodh C.
    Ismail, Abdelbagi M.
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2020, 10 (12):
  • [8] Productivity and profitability of sorghum-wheat cropping system in saline soils as influenced by conservation agriculture practices
    Soni, Pooja Gupta
    Rai, Arvind Kumar
    Basak, Nirmalendu
    Kumar, Parveen
    Sundha, Parul
    RANGE MANAGEMENT AND AGROFORESTRY, 2021, 42 (02) : 277 - 285
  • [9] Impacts of Climate Smart Agriculture Practices on Soil Water Conservation and Maize Productivity in Rainfed Cropping Systems of Uganda
    Zizinga, Alex
    Mwanjalolo, Jackson-Gilbert Majaliwa
    Tietjen, Britta
    Bedadi, Bobe
    Gabiri, Geofrey
    Luswata, Kizza Charles
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2022, 6
  • [10] Residue retention and nitrogen management of preceding crops influences the productivity, profitability and environmental footprints of summer mungbean in maize-based cropping systems under conservation agriculture
    Kadam, Praveen V.
    Jat, Shankar Lal
    Mahala, Deep Mohan
    Parihar, C. M.
    Singh, A. K.
    Kumar, Bhupender
    Gambhir, Geetika
    Radheshyam
    Chandra, M. Sharath
    ARCHIVES OF AGRONOMY AND SOIL SCIENCE, 2023, 69 (11) : 1990 - 2005