Summary Report on the Graded Prognostic Assessment: An Accurate and Facile Diagnosis-Specific Tool to Estimate Survival for Patients With Brain Metastases

被引:1087
作者
Sperduto, Paul W.
Kased, Norbert [3 ]
Roberge, David [17 ]
Xu, Zhiyuan [4 ]
Shanley, Ryan [1 ]
Luo, Xianghua [1 ]
Sneed, Penny K. [3 ]
Chao, Samuel T. [4 ]
Weil, Robert J. [4 ]
Suh, John [4 ]
Bhatt, Amit [5 ]
Jensen, Ashley W. [2 ]
Brown, Paul D. [2 ]
Shih, Helen A. [6 ]
Kirkpatrick, John [8 ]
Gaspar, Laurie E. [9 ]
Fiveash, John B. [10 ]
Chiang, Veronica [11 ,12 ]
Knisely, Jonathan P. S. [13 ,14 ]
Sperduto, Christina Maria [15 ]
Lin, Nancy [7 ]
Mehta, Minesh [16 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[4] Cleveland Clin, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[5] Univ Wisconsin, Madison, WI USA
[6] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[7] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[8] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Durham, NC USA
[9] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Aurora, CO USA
[10] Univ Alabama, Med Ctr Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USA
[11] Yale Univ, Sch Med, New Haven, CT USA
[12] Yale Canc Ctr, New Haven, CT USA
[13] Hofstra Univ, Sch Med, Manhasset, NY USA
[14] N Shore Long Isl Jewish Hlth Syst, Manhasset, NY USA
[15] Dartmouth Coll, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[16] Northwestern Univ, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[17] McGill Univ, Ctr Hlth, Montreal, PQ, Canada
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
PARTITIONING ANALYSIS RPA; RANDOMIZED PHASE-III; RADIATION; CLASSIFICATION; VALIDATION; CANCER; TRIAL; INDEX;
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2011.38.0527
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Our group has previously published the Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA), a prognostic index for patients with brain metastases. Updates have been published with refinements to create diagnosis-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment indices. The purpose of this report is to present the updated diagnosis-specific GPA indices in a single, unified, user-friendly report to allow ease of access and use by treating physicians. Methods A multi-institutional retrospective (1985 to 2007) database of 3,940 patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases underwent univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors associated with outcomes by primary site and treatment. Significant prognostic factors were used to define the diagnosis-specific GPA prognostic indices. A GPA of 4.0 correlates with the best prognosis, whereas a GPA of 0.0 corresponds with the worst prognosis. Results Significant prognostic factors varied by diagnosis. For lung cancer, prognostic factors were Karnofsky performance score, age, presence of extracranial metastases, and number of brain metastases, confirming the original Lung-GPA. For melanoma and renal cell cancer, prognostic factors were Karnofsky performance score and the number of brain metastases. For breast cancer, prognostic factors were tumor subtype, Karnofsky performance score, and age. For GI cancer, the only prognostic factor was the Karnofsky performance score. The median survival times by GPA score and diagnosis were determined. Conclusion Prognostic factors for patients with brain metastases vary by diagnosis, and for each diagnosis, a robust separation into different GPA scores was discerned, implying considerable heterogeneity in outcome, even within a single tumor type. In summary, these indices and related worksheet provide an accurate and facile diagnosis-specific tool to estimate survival, potentially select appropriate treatment, and stratify clinical trials for patients with brain metastases. J Clin Oncol 30: 419-425. (C) 2011 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 425
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1997, 61 SECT BIOST MAYO C
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1984, OLSHEN STONE CLASSIF, DOI 10.2307/2530946
  • [3] Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) of prognostic factors in three radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) brain metastases trials
    Gaspar, L
    Scott, C
    Rotman, M
    Asbell, S
    Phillips, T
    Wasserman, T
    McKenna, WG
    Byhardt, R
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 37 (04): : 745 - 751
  • [4] Validation of the RTOG recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classification for brain metastases
    Gaspar, LE
    Scott, C
    Murray, K
    Curran, W
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 47 (04): : 1001 - 1006
  • [5] Cancer statistics, 2008
    Jemal, Ahmedin
    Siegel, Rebecca
    Ward, Elizabeth
    Hao, Yongping
    Xu, Jiaquan
    Murray, Taylor
    Thun, Michael J.
    [J]. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2008, 58 (02) : 71 - 96
  • [6] KOMARNICKY LT, 1991, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V20, P53
  • [7] A randomized phase III study of accelerated hyperfractionation versus standard in patients with unresected brain metastases: A report of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 9104
    Murray, KJ
    Scott, C
    Greenberg, HM
    Emami, B
    Seider, M
    Vora, NL
    Olson, C
    Whitton, A
    Movsas, B
    Curran, W
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 39 (03): : 571 - 574
  • [8] Osler W, 1928, CHAUVINISM MED AEQUA, P300
  • [9] RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF RADIOTHERAPY AND BROMODEOXYURIDINE WITH RADIOTHERAPY ALONE FOR BRAIN METASTASES - REPORT OF RTOG TRIAL 89-05
    PHILLIPS, TL
    SCOTT, CB
    LEIBEL, SA
    ROTMAN, M
    WEIGENSBERG, IJ
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 33 (02): : 339 - 348
  • [10] Posner J B., 1995, Neurologic Complications of Cancer