Effects of light-emitting diode light v. fluorescent light on growing performance, activity levels and well-being of non-beak-trimmed W-36 pullets

被引:12
作者
Liu, K. [1 ]
Xin, H. [1 ]
Settar, P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Agr & Biosyst Engn, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[2] Hy Line Int, Dallas Ctr, IA 50063 USA
关键词
poultry lighting; growing performance; activity level; feather condition; animal behavior; LAYING HENS; MONOCHROMATIC LIGHT; BROILER CHICKEN; EGG-PRODUCTION; GROWTH; BEHAVIOR; POULTRY; WELFARE; COLOR; PREFERENCE;
D O I
10.1017/S1751731117001240
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
More energy-efficient, readily dimmable, long-lasting and more affordable light-emitting diode (LED) lights are increasingly finding applications in poultry production facilities. Despite anecdotal evidence about the benefits of such lighting on bird performance and behavior, concrete research data were lacking. In this study, a commercial poultry-specific LED light (dim-to-blue, controllable correlated color temperature (CCT) from 4500 to 5300 K) and a typical compact fluorescent light (CFL) (soft white, CCT=2700 K) were compared with regards to their effects on growing performance, activity levels, and feather and comb conditions of non-beak-trimmed W-36 pullets during a 14-week rearing period. A total of 1280-day-old pullets in two successive batches, 640 birds each, were used in the study. For each batch, pullets were randomly assigned to four identical litter-floor rooms equipped with perches, two rooms per light regimen, 160 birds per room. Body weight, BW uniformity (BWU), BW gain (BWG) and cumulative mortality rate (CMR) of the pullets were determined every 2 weeks from day-old to 14 weeks of age (WOA). Activity levels of the pullets at 5 to 14 WOA were delineated by movement index. Results revealed that pullets under the LED and CFL lights had comparable BW (1140 +/- 5 g v. 1135 +/- 5 g, P = 0.41), BWU (90.8 +/- 1.0% v. 91.9 +/- 1.0%, P = 0.48) and CMR (1.3 +/- 0.6% v. 2.7 +/- 0.6%, P = 0.18) at 14 WOA despite some varying BWG during the rearing. Circadian activity levels of the pullets were higher under the LED light than under the CFL light, possibly resulting from differences in spectrum and/or perceived light intensity between the two lights. No feather damage or comb wound was apparent in either light regimen at the end of the rearing period. The results contribute to understanding the impact of emerging LED lights on pullets rearing which is a critical component of egg production.
引用
收藏
页码:106 / 115
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
[21]   The prevention and control of feather pecking: application to commercial systems [J].
Nicol, C. J. ;
Bestman, M. ;
Gilani, A-M. ;
De Haas, E. N. ;
De Jong, I. C. ;
Lambton, S. ;
Wagenaar, J. P. ;
Weeks, C. A. ;
Rodenburg, T. B. .
WORLDS POULTRY SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2013, 69 (04) :775-788
[22]   Effects of light sources and intensity on broilers grown to heavy weights. Part 1: Growth performance, carcass characteristics, and welfare indices [J].
Olanrewaju, H. A. ;
Miller, W. W. ;
Maslin, W. R. ;
Collier, S. D. ;
Purswell, J. L. ;
Branton, S. L. .
POULTRY SCIENCE, 2016, 95 (04) :727-735
[23]   A review of the evolution of animal colour vision and visual communication signals [J].
Osorio, D. ;
Vorobyev, M. .
VISION RESEARCH, 2008, 48 (20) :2042-2051
[24]   Light emitting diode (LED) as a source of monochromatic light: a novel lighting approach for behaviour, physiology and welfare of poultry [J].
Parvin, R. ;
Mushtaq, M. M. H. ;
Kim, M. J. ;
Choi, H. C. .
WORLDS POULTRY SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2014, 70 (03) :543-555
[25]   The effects of color of lighting on the behavior and production of meat chickens [J].
Prayitno, DS ;
Phillips, CJC ;
Omed, H .
POULTRY SCIENCE, 1997, 76 (03) :452-457
[26]  
Prescott NB, 2003, ANIM WELFARE, V12, P269
[27]   Preference and motivation of laying hens to eat under different illuminances and the effect of illuminance on eating behaviour [J].
Prescott, NB ;
Wathes, CM .
BRITISH POULTRY SCIENCE, 2002, 43 (02) :190-195
[28]   THE INFLUENCE OF LIGHT QUALITY ON INITIATION OF EGG-LAYING BY HENS [J].
PYRZAK, R ;
SNAPIR, N ;
GOODMAN, G ;
ARNON, E ;
PEREK, M .
POULTRY SCIENCE, 1986, 65 (01) :190-193
[29]   The effect of a green and blue monochromatic light combination on broiler growth and development [J].
Rozenboim, I ;
Biran, I ;
Chaiseha, Y ;
Yahav, S ;
Rosenstrauch, A ;
Sklan, D ;
Halevy, O .
POULTRY SCIENCE, 2004, 83 (05) :842-845
[30]   Calculating luminous flux and lighting levels for domesticated mammals and birds [J].
Saunders, J. E. ;
Jarvis, J. R. ;
Wathes, C. M. .
ANIMAL, 2008, 2 (06) :921-932