Comparison between filtrations at fixed transmembrane pressure and fixed permeate flux: application to a membrane bioreactor used for wastewater treatment

被引:164
作者
Defrance, L [1 ]
Jaffrin, MY [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol Compiegne, UMR 6600, Res Ctr, F-60205 Compiegne, France
关键词
membrane bioreactor; wastewater treatment; critical flux; membrane fouling;
D O I
10.1016/S0376-7388(98)00220-8
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment must operate for long periods without chemical cleaning. This paper investigates the critical flux concept introduced by Field et al. as a means for achieving this goal. Experiments were conducted on a membrane bioreactor containing 6001 of activated sludge, equipped with a 0.25 m(2) ceramic membrane and located in Compiegne wastewater treatment plant. Hydraulic retention time was set at 24 h and sludge retention time at 60 days, so that suspended solids concentration stabilises at 10 g/l. We conducted two series of tests: at fixed transmembrane pressure (TMP) and at fixed permeate flux, set by a volumetric pump on the permeate. In both cases, velocity was varied from 1 to 5 m/s. In fixed flux tests, the Aux was increased by 10 l/h m(2) increments and the TMP was observed to rise moderately first and then stabilise in about 15 min until a critical value of the flux is reached. Above this critical flux, the TMP rises rapidly and does not stabilise, as in dead-end filtration. The critical flux was found to increase approximately linearly with velocity, reaching about 115 l/h m(2) at 4 m/s. These data were reproducible at various dates between 30 and 120 days of continuous operation of the bioreactor and permit to know at which flux a membrane bioreactor must be operated. Comparison of constant pressure and constant flux tests under same conditions showed that the critical flux is almost identical to the limiting or pressure independent flux obtained in constant pressure. More generally, constant flux procedure below the critical flux avoids overfouling of the membrane in the initial stage and is more advantageous for membrane bioreactor operation. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 210
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Design and operation of anaerobic membrane bioreactors: Development of a filtration testing strategy [J].
Beaubien, A ;
Baty, M ;
Jeannot, F ;
Francoeur, E ;
Manem, J .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1996, 109 (02) :173-184
[2]  
BEHAC JP, 1984, TRAITEMENT EAUX USEE
[3]   Particle deposition during membrane filtration of colloids: Transition between concentration polarization and cake formation [J].
Chen, V ;
Fane, AG ;
Madaeni, S ;
Wenten, IG .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1997, 125 (01) :109-122
[4]   PERFORMANCE OF MEMBRANE SEPARATION BIOREACTOR AT VARIOUS TEMPERATURES FOR DOMESTIC WASTE-WATER TREATMENT [J].
CHIEMCHAISRI, C ;
YAMAMOTO, K .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1994, 87 (1-2) :119-129
[5]  
FANE AG, 1990, P 5 WORLD FILTR C NI, P320
[6]   CRITICAL FLUX CONCEPT FOR MICROFILTRATION FOULING [J].
FIELD, RW ;
WU, D ;
HOWELL, JA ;
GUPTA, BB .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1995, 100 (03) :259-272
[7]   SUBCRITICAL FLUX OPERATION OF MICROFILTRATION [J].
HOWELL, JA .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1995, 107 (1-2) :165-171
[8]   INTERPRETATION OF TRANSIENT ULTRAFILTRATION AND MICROFILTRATION OF BLOOD AND PROTEIN SOLUTIONS [J].
JAFFRIN, MY ;
DING, LH ;
DEFOSSEZ, M ;
LAURENT, JM .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 1995, 50 (06) :907-915
[9]   PRESSURIZED BIOREACTOR WITH MEMBRANE FILTRATION FOR WASTE-WATER TREATMENT [J].
KRAUTH, K ;
STAAB, KF .
WATER RESEARCH, 1993, 27 (03) :405-411
[10]  
KWON DY, 1996, P IMSTEC 96, P59