A review of monetary valuation in life cycle assessment: State of the art and future needs

被引:50
作者
Amadei, Andrea Martino [1 ]
De Laurentiis, Valeria [1 ]
Sala, Serenella [1 ]
机构
[1] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, Via Enrico Fermi 2749, I-21027 Ispra, VA, Italy
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Monetization; Monetary valuation; Weighting; Life cycle impact assessment;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129668
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Monetary valuation is used in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to aggregate environmental impacts expressed with different units of measure and therefore not directly comparable, in order to facilitate the communication and the use of LCA results in decision-making processes. Although several authors have discussed the advantages of using monetary valuation in the weighting phase of LCA, its practical implementation is still challenging. The aim of this study is to critically assess the available monetary valuation approaches applicable in LCA and highlight challenges and research needs towards the development of a set of monetary valuation factors to be applied to life cycle impact assessment methods, e.g., the European Environmental Footprint one. To this end, a literature review was performed to collect and compare monetary valuation coefficients. The review highlighted significant variability in the availability of monetary valuation coefficients across impact categories, with some (e.g., climate change) commonly analyzed, compared to others (e.g., terrestrial euthrophication) with very little information available to date. The collected monetary valuation coefficients were tested in a case study on the environmental impacts of the consumption of an average European citizen. Results were compared with the per capita household expenditure as a point of reference, yielding a contribution of the external damage ranging from 15% to 41% of the per capita expenditure. The novelty of this work lies in performing an updated and systematic assessment of the available monetary valuation approaches for LCA and investigating the variability of the results that stem from the adoption of different approaches, paving the way towards an increased use of LCA and environmental considerations in decision making processes.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
Adensam H., 2002, EXTERNE KOSTEN STUDI
[2]  
Ahlroth S., 2009, THESIS ROYAL I TECHN
[3]   The use of valuation and weighting sets in environmental impact assessment [J].
Ahlroth, Sofia .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2014, 85 :34-41
[4]   Ecovalue08-A new valuation set for environmental systems analysis tools [J].
Ahlroth, Sofia ;
Finnveden, Goran .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2011, 19 (17-18) :1994-2003
[5]   Weighting and valuation in selected environmental systems analysis tools - suggestions for further developments [J].
Ahlroth, Sofia ;
Nilsson, Mans ;
Finnveden, Goran ;
Hjelm, Olof ;
Hochschorner, Elisabeth .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2011, 19 (2-3) :145-156
[6]  
Alberici Sacha., 2014, SUBSIDIES COSTS EU E
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2009, CATEG INDIC MIDPOINT
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2006, "ISO 14040:2006-Environmental Management-Life Cycle Assessment- Principles and Framework.", DOI DOI 10.1007/S11367-011-0297-3
[9]   Comparison of Different Monetization Methods in LCA: A Review [J].
Arendt, Rosalie ;
Bachmann, Till M. ;
Motoshita, Masaharu ;
Bach, Vanessa ;
Finkbeiner, Matthias .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (24) :1-39
[10]  
atmosfair gGmbH, 2019, FAQS CO2 BER