Facial expression and prosodic prominence: Effects of modality and facial area

被引:92
作者
Swerts, Marc [1 ]
Krahmer, Emiel [1 ]
机构
[1] Tilburg Univ, Fac Arts, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.wocn.2007.05.001
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
This article addresses two related questions regarding the perception of facial markers of prominence in spoken utterances: (1) how important are visual cues to prominence from the face with respect to auditory cues? and (2) are there differences between different facial areas in their cue value for prosodic prominence? The first perception experiment tackles the relation between auditory and visual cues by means of a reaction-time experiment. For this experiment, recordings of a sentence with three prosodically prominent words were systematically manipulated in such a way that auditory and visual cues to prominence were either congruent (occurring on the same word) or incongruent (in that the auditory and the visual cue were positioned on different words). Participants were instructed to indicate as fast as possible which word they perceived as the most prominent one. Results show that participants can more easily determine prominence when the visual cue occurs on the same word as the auditory cue, while displaced visual cues hinder prominence perception. The second experiment investigates which area of a speaker's face contains the strongest cues to prominence, using stimuli with either the entire face visible or only parts of it. The task of the participants was to indicate for each stimulus which word they perceived as the most prominent one. Results show that the upper facial area has stronger cue value for prominence detection than the bottom part, and that the left part of the face is more important than the right part. Results of mirror-images of the original fragments show that this latter result is due both to a speaker and an observer effect. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 238
页数:20
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], INVESTIGANDO LINGUAG
[2]   The ability of right- and left-hemisphere-damaged individuals to produce and interpret prosodic cues marking phrasal boundaries [J].
Baum, SR ;
Pell, MD ;
Leonard, CL ;
Gordon, JK .
LANGUAGE AND SPEECH, 1997, 40 :313-330
[3]   The ventriloquist effect does not depend on the direction of deliberate visual attention [J].
Bertelson, P ;
Vroomen, J ;
de Gelder, B ;
Driver, J .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2000, 62 (02) :321-332
[4]  
BESKOW J, 2006, P INT PITTSB PA, P1272
[5]   Facial asymmetry during emotional expression: Gender, valence, and measurement technique [J].
Borod, JC ;
Koff, E ;
Yecker, S ;
Santschi, C ;
Schmidt, JM .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1998, 36 (11) :1209-1215
[6]   RIGHT-HEMISPHERE SPECIALIZATION FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF EMOTIONAL WORDS AND SENTENCES - EVIDENCE FROM STROKE PATIENTS [J].
BOROD, JC ;
ANDELMAN, F ;
OBLER, LK ;
TWEEDY, JR ;
WELKOWITZ, J .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1992, 30 (09) :827-844
[7]   Are the perceptual biases found in chimeric face processing reflected in eye-movement patterns? [J].
Butler, S ;
Gilchrist, ID ;
Burt, DM ;
Perrett, DI ;
Jones, E ;
Harvey, M .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2005, 43 (01) :52-59
[8]  
Cassell J, 2001, COMP GRAPH, P477, DOI 10.1145/383259.383315
[9]  
Cave C, 1996, ICSLP 96 - FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SPOKEN LANGUAGE PROCESSING, PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-4, P2175, DOI 10.1109/ICSLP.1996.607235
[10]   Prosodic influences on consonant production in Dutch: Effects of prosodic boundaries, phrasal accent and lexical stress [J].
Cho, TH ;
McQueen, JM .
JOURNAL OF PHONETICS, 2005, 33 (02) :121-157