Voluntary monitoring of households in waste disposal: An application of the institutional analysis and development framework

被引:21
作者
Zhang, Zhijian [1 ]
Zhao, Liange [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Gongshang Univ, Sch Econ, 18 Xuezheng Rd, Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Waste disposal monitoring; Social capital; Intention behavior gap; Institutional analysis and development framework; COMMUNITY FOREST MANAGEMENT; SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS; LOCAL COMMONS MANAGEMENT; COLLECTIVE ACTION; CONDITIONAL COOPERATION; FARMER PARTICIPATION; IAD FRAMEWORK; GROUP-SIZE; GOVERNANCE; IRRIGATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.12.018
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
While increasing consensus has grown around the important role of monitoring in environmental resource governance, little is known about under what conditions people would rather pay private costs to implement monitoring and punishment. Using field survey data on communities and households from four suburb areas in China, this paper employs Institutional Analysis and Development framework to empirically examine households' willingness and actual activities on waste disposal monitoring. The empirical results show that population density, community modernization, and being male significantly increase the likelihood of households supervising waste disposal while community size and heterogeneity of wealth and ethnicity seriously impede the involvement of households in waste disposal supervision. More importantly, our estimation results reveal that staffing community with full-time cadres for sanitation management suppress the enthusiasm of households in conducting waste disposal supervision, but stock of social capital and peer monitoring substantially increase the intention to supervise waste disposal and the possibility of households engaging in waste disposal supervision activities. In addition, social norms, household income, and householder age are primary predictors of the intention-behavior gap between hypothetical willingness to monitor and actual monitoring behavior. Therefore, improving community infrastructure and economic condition, reducing external intervention on community affairs, and cultivating social capital stock are important approaches to enhance public participation in environmental governance.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 59
页数:15
相关论文
共 120 条
  • [1] Recycling: Social norms and warm-glow revisited
    Abbott, Andrew
    Nandeibam, Shasikanta
    O'Shea, Lucy
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 90 : 10 - 18
  • [2] Managing tragedies: Understanding conflict over common pool resources
    Adams, WM
    Brockington, D
    Dyson, J
    Vira, B
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2003, 302 (5652) : 1915 - 1916
  • [3] Adger WN, 2003, ECON GEOGR, V79, P387
  • [4] Challenges and issues in moving towards sustainable landfilling in a transitory country - Malaysia
    Agamuthu, P.
    Fauziah, S. H.
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2011, 29 (01) : 13 - 19
  • [5] Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources
    Agrawal, A
    [J]. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 29 (10) : 1649 - 1672
  • [6] Social capital vs institutions in the growth process
    Ahlerup, Pelle
    Olsson, Ola
    Yanagizawa, David
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2009, 25 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [7] Anderies JM, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
  • [8] Exploring environmental perceptions, behaviors and awareness: water and water pollution in South Africa
    Anderson, Barbara A.
    Romani, John H.
    Phillips, Heston
    Wentzel, Marie
    Tlabela, Kholadi
    [J]. POPULATION AND ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 28 (03) : 133 - 161
  • [9] Andersson K., 2006, Sustainability: Science, Practice & Policy, V2, P25
  • [10] [Anonymous], 1989, Ration Soc