Acoustic schwannomas: Awareness of radiologic error will reduce unnecessary treatment

被引:22
作者
Marshall, AH [1 ]
Owen, VMF
Nikolopoulos, TP
O'Donoghue, GM
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham Hosp, Queens Med Ctr NHS Trust, Dept Otolaryngol, Nottingham NG7 2UH, England
[2] MRC, Inst Hearing Res, Nottingham, England
[3] Univ Athens, Dept Otolaryngol, Athens, Greece
关键词
acoustic schwannoma; size; magnetic resonance imaging; interobserver comparisons;
D O I
10.1097/01.mao.0000169782.69341.6d
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To measure the intra- and interobserver error in size estimation of acoustic schwannomas from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans by experienced radiologists to determine whether small amounts of tumor growth that may affect management (2 mm) could be reliably measured in clinical practice. Design: Duplicated, blinded size estimation of acoustic neuromas (according to American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery guidelines, 1995) from MRI scans of patients with acoustic neuromas. Setting: Tertiary referral teaching hospital and DGH. Participants: Four radiologists (including 2 dedicated neuroradiologists) measuring positive MRI scans of 26 patients with an acoustic neuroma. Main Outcome Measure: Intraradiologist and inter-radiologist repeatability coefficients in millimeters for the maximal tumor diameter in the anteroposterior (AP) axis, medial-longitudinal (NIL) axis, and the square-root of the product of these two measurements. Repeatability coefficients give the 95% range within which the differences in repeated measurements lie. Results: The intraradiologist repeatability for AP and ML measurements ranged from 1.51 to 6.03 mm and 2.01 to 3.83 mm, respectively. The repeatability of the square-root of the product ranged from 1.43 to 4.94 mm. The inter-radiologist repeatability was 6.48 mm and 7.46 mm for the AP and ML measurements, respectively, giving a repeatability of 3.65 mm for the square-root of the product. Conclusion: The study indicates that, in routine clinical practice, differences in tumor size of the order of 2 mm cannot be reliably measured, even by the same radiologist. Thus, reported growth of acoustic tumors should be interpreted with caution, especially if this is the criterion for recommending treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:512 / 515
页数:4
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Prevalence of unsuspected acoustic neuroma found by magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Anderson, TD ;
Loevner, LA ;
Bigelow, DC ;
Mirza, N .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2000, 122 (05) :643-646
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, V113, P179
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1982, P BIOM CONS C NAT I
[4]   Impairments, disabilities, and handicaps after acoustic neuroma surgery [J].
Bateman, N ;
Nikolopoulos, TP ;
Robinson, K ;
O'Donoghue, GM .
CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2000, 25 (01) :62-65
[5]  
Bland JM, 1996, BRIT MED J, V313, P744
[6]   Current management of acoustic neuromas: review of surgical approaches and outcomes [J].
Briggs, RJS ;
Fabinyi, G ;
Kaye, AH .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 7 (06) :521-526
[7]   Impact of facial paralysis on patients with acoustic neuroma [J].
Cross, T ;
Sheard, CE ;
Garrud, P ;
Nikolopoulos, TP ;
O'Donoghue, GM .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2000, 110 (09) :1539-1542
[8]   SAMPLE-SIZE REQUIREMENTS FOR RELIABILITY STUDIES [J].
DONNER, A ;
ELIASZIW, M .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1987, 6 (04) :441-448
[9]  
ESSES BA, 1994, AM J OTOL, V15, P810
[10]  
FIIGAARD B, 1997, NEURORADIOLOGY, V39, P599