Characterization of major water-soluble inorganic ions in size-fractionated particulate matters in Shanghai campus ambient air

被引:88
作者
Xiu, GL [1 ]
Zhang, DN [1 ]
Chen, JZ [1 ]
Huang, XJ [1 ]
Chen, ZX [1 ]
Guo, HL [1 ]
Pan, JF [1 ]
机构
[1] E China Univ Sci & Technol, Inst Environm Engn, Shanghai 200237, Peoples R China
关键词
fine particle; sulfate; nitrate; size distribution; correlation;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.09.053
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The size-fractionated inhalable particles in ambient air were collected at the top of a lab building in a university campus of Shanghai; F-, Cl-, NO3-, SO42-, and NH4+ were extracted to determine the concentration. In every size, the concentration of the five ions followed the order of SO42- > NO3- similar to NH4+ similar to Cl- > F-. Their concentrations in PM1.6 were 5-7, 1-5, 3, 1-3, and similar to0.1 mug/m(3), respectively, and occupied about 8-11%, 2-7%, similar to6%, 2-6%, and similar to0.1% of PM1.6 mass, respectively. In PM8, about 70% of each ion existed in PM1.6, while in PM3.7, 50-80% was in PM1.6. The size distributions of SO42-, NO3-, Cl-, and F- were characterized by bimodal types with fine mode peaking around 0.7 mum and coarse particle mode peaking around 3-5 mum. NH4+ showed a single fine mode peaking at 0.7 mum. Fine mode dominated the size distribution of SO42-, NO3-, and NH4+. SO42-, NO3-, Cl-, and NH4+ had a good correlation in PM1.6 between each other. But SO42- strongly correlated to NO3- at every size stage. Comparison of size-fractionated equivalent ratios between [SO42-] and [NH4+] suggested that the existing forms of SO42-, NO3-, Cl-, and NH4+ were probably (NH4)(2)SO4, NH4NO3, and NH4Cl. [SO42-]/[NO3-] ratio in fine mode was > 1, which revealed that stationary source emission was still the important contributor to fine particles. The main sources of particulate inorganic ions were also discussed. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 236
页数:10
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Sources and composition of PM2.5 at the National Energy Technology Laboratory in Pittsburgh during July and August 2000 [J].
Anderson, RR ;
Martello, DV ;
Rohar, PC ;
Strazisar, BR ;
Tamilia, JP ;
Waldner, K ;
White, CM ;
Modey, WK ;
Mangelson, NF ;
Eatough, DJ .
ENERGY & FUELS, 2002, 16 (02) :261-269
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, 40 CFR part 50, Federal Register, V62, P38651
[3]   Relationships among aerosol constituents from Asia and the North Pacific during PEM-West A [J].
Arimoto, R ;
Duce, RA ;
Savoie, DL ;
Prospero, JM ;
Talbot, R ;
Cullen, JD ;
Tomza, U ;
Lewis, NF ;
Jay, BJ .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1996, 101 (D1) :2011-2023
[4]   Chemical composition of size-resolved atmospheric aerosols in the eastern Mediterranean during summer and winter [J].
Bardouki, H ;
Liakakou, H ;
Economou, C ;
Sciare, J ;
Smolík, J ;
Zdímal, V ;
Eleftheriadis, K ;
Lazaridis, M ;
Dye, C ;
Mihalopoulos, N .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 37 (02) :195-208
[5]  
Baron P.A, 1993, AEROSOL MEASUREMENT, P249
[6]   The influence of weather-type and long-range transport on airborne particle concentrations in Edinburgh, UK [J].
Buchanan, CM ;
Beverland, IJ ;
Heal, MR .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 36 (34) :5343-5354
[7]  
CASTRO T, 2001, ATMOS ENVIRON, V15, P1765
[8]  
CHANDRA V, 1998, ATMOS ENVIRON, V35, P2647
[9]   Descriptive analysis of PM(2.5) and PM(10) at regionally representative locations during SJVAQS/AUSPEX [J].
Chow, JC ;
Watson, JG ;
Lu, ZQ ;
Lowenthal, DH ;
Frazier, CA ;
Solomon, PA ;
Thuillier, RH ;
Magliano, K .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1996, 30 (12) :2079-2112
[10]   PM(10) AND PM(2.5) COMPOSITIONS IN CALIFORNIA SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY [J].
CHOW, JC ;
WATSON, JG ;
LOWENTHAL, DH ;
SOLOMON, PA ;
MAGLIANO, KL ;
ZIMAN, SD ;
RICHARDS, LW .
AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1993, 18 (02) :105-128