Association of Short Interpregnancy Interval With Pregnancy Outcomes According to Maternal Age

被引:144
作者
Schummers, Laura [1 ,2 ]
Hutcheon, Jennifer A. [3 ]
Hernandez-Diaz, Sonia [1 ]
Williams, Paige L. [1 ,4 ]
Hacker, Michele R. [1 ,5 ]
VanderWeele, J. [1 ,4 ]
Norman, Wendy, V [2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Univ British Columbia, Dept Family Practice, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] Univ British Columbia, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[4] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Boston, MA USA
[5] Harvard Med Sch, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Boston, MA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
ADVERSE PERINATAL OUTCOMES; BIRTH; RISK; MORBIDITY;
D O I
10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4696
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE Interpregnancy intervals shorter than 18 months are associated with higher risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes. It is currently unknown whether short intervals are associated with increased risks among older women to the same extent as among younger women. OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether the association between short interpregnancy (delivery to conception) interval and adverse pregnancy outcomes is modified by maternal age. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A population-based cohort study conducted in British Columbia, Canada, evaluated women with 2 or more singleton pregnancies from 2004 to 2014 with the first (index) pregnancy resulting in a live birth. Data analysis was performed from January 1 to July 20, 2018. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Risks of maternal mortality or severe morbidity (eg, mechanical ventilation, blood transfusion >3 U, intensive care unit admission, organ failure, death), small-for-gestational age (<10th birthweight percentile for gestational age and sex), fetal and infant composite outcome (stillbirth, infant death, <third birthweight percentile for gestational age and sex, delivery <28 weeks), and spontaneous and indicated preterm delivery. Risks of each outcome for 3-to 24-month interpregnancy intervals were estimated, according to maternal age at index birth (20-34 and >= 35 years). Adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) comparing predicted risks at 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month intervals with risks at 18-month intervals for each age group were calculated. The potential role of other factors explaining any differences (unmeasured confounding) was examined in several sensitivity analyses. RESULTS Among 148 544 pregnancies, maternal mortality or severe morbidity risks were increased at 6-month compared with 18-month interpregnancy intervals for women aged 35 years or older (0.62% at 6 months vs 0.26% at 18 months; aRR, 2.39; 95% CI, 2.03-2.80), but not for women aged 20 to 34 years (0.23% at 6 months vs 0.25% at 18 months; aRR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.83-1.02). Increased adverse fetal and infant outcome risks were more pronounced for women aged 20 to 34 years (2.0% at 6 months vs 1.4% at 18 months; aRR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.36-1.47) than women 35 years or older (2.1% at 6 months vs 1.8% at 18 months; aRR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.01-1.31). Risks of spontaneous preterm delivery at 6-month interpregnancy intervals were increased for women 20 to 34 years old (5.3% at 6 months vs 3.2% at 18 months; aRR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.62-1.68) and to a lesser extent for women 35 years or older (5.0% at 6 months vs 3.6% at 18 months; aRR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.31-1.49). Modest increases in risks of small-for-gestational age and indicated preterm delivery at short intervals did not vary meaningfully by maternal age. Sensitivity analyses suggested that observed associations were not fully explained by unmeasured confounding. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The findings of this study suggest that short interpregnancy intervals are associated with increased risks for adverse pregnancy outcomes for women of all ages.
引用
收藏
页码:1661 / 1670
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Statistics Notes - Interaction revisited: the difference between two estimates [J].
Altman, DG ;
Bland, JM .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 326 (7382) :219-219
[2]   Change in paternity, risk of placental abruption and confounding by birth interval: a population-based prospective cohort study in Norway, 1967-2009 [J].
Ananth, Cande V. ;
Skjaerven, Rolv ;
Klunssoyr, Kari .
BMJ OPEN, 2015, 5 (02)
[3]   Re-evaluation of link between interpregnancy interval and adverse birth outcomes: retrospective cohort study matching two intervals per mother [J].
Ball, Stephen J. ;
Pereira, Gavin ;
Jacoby, Peter ;
de Klerk, Nicholas ;
Stanley, Fiona J. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 349
[4]   A new framework for managing and analyzing multiply imputed data in Stata [J].
Carlin, John B. ;
Galati, John C. ;
Royston, Patrick .
STATA JOURNAL, 2008, 8 (01) :49-67
[5]   Short and Long Interpregnancy Intervals: Correlates And Variations by Pregnancy Timing Among US Women [J].
Cheslack-Postava, Keely ;
Winter, Alix S. .
PERSPECTIVES ON SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2015, 47 (01) :19-26
[6]   Within-Family Analysis of Interpregnancy Interval and Adverse Birth Outcomes [J].
Class, Quetzal A. ;
Rickert, Martin E. ;
Oberg, Anna S. ;
Sujan, Ayesha C. ;
Almqvist, Catarina ;
Larsson, Henrik ;
Lichtenstein, Paul ;
D'Onofrio, Brian M. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 130 (06) :1304-1311
[7]   Maternal morbidity and mortality associated with interpregnancy interval:: cross sectional study [J].
Conde-Agudelo, A ;
Belizán, JM .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 321 (7271) :1255-1259
[8]   Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes - A meta-analysis [J].
Conde-Agudelo, A ;
Rosas-Bermúdez, A ;
Kafury-Goeta, AC .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 295 (15) :1809-1823
[9]   The Impact of Computing Interpregnancy Intervals Without Accounting for Intervening Pregnancy Events [J].
Conzuelo-Rodriguez, Gabriel ;
Naimi, Ashley I. .
PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 32 (02) :141-148
[10]   Advanced maternal age, short interpregnancy interval, and perinatal outcome [J].
de Weger, Frederike J. ;
Hukkelhoven, Chantal W. P. M. ;
Serroyen, Jan ;
Velde, Egbert R. Te ;
Smits, Luc J. M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 204 (05) :421.e1-421.e9