Green technology adoption in textiles and apparel supply chains with environmental taxes

被引:85
作者
Shen, Bin [1 ]
Zhu, Chen [1 ]
Li, Qingying [1 ]
Wang, Xiaofeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Donghua Univ, Glorious Sun Sch Business & Management, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
supply chain; textiles and apparel; green technology adoption; environmental taxes; monopoly; duopoly; CAP-AND-TRADE; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; COMPETITION; SPILLOVER; ENERGY; COORDINATION; RESILIENCE; MANAGEMENT; INDUSTRY;
D O I
10.1080/00207543.2020.1758354
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Sustainability is crucially important in the textiles and apparel (TA) supply chains. In this paper, we evaluate the impact of clean technology adoption and environmental taxes on the TA supply chains. First, we consider a monopoly case, where a two-echelon supply chain consists of one buyer and one manufacturer. We find that raising the environmental tax rate motivates the manufacturer to invest in green technologies. We then extend our model to examine the duopoly case. We find that in the duopoly case, if the buyer's market share is sufficiently small (large), the optimal greenness level for this buyer's product decreases (increases) in the environmental tax rate; whereas if the two products market shares are relatively equal, the optimal greenness levels for both products buyers increase in the environmental tax rate. The existence of the spillover effect reduces the cost and improves the product greenness. Consumer welfare can be improved if the efficiency of green technology adoption and the coefficient of greenness level on market demand are sufficiently high. This result implies that if the government cares about consumers, the manufacturer should be encouraged to enhance the cost reduction ability in terms of green technology, and consumer education about sustainability consciousness should be enhanced.
引用
收藏
页码:4157 / 4174
页数:18
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] Investment in Shared Suppliers: Effect of Learning, Spillover, and Competition
    Agrawal, Anupam
    Kim, Youngsoo
    Kwon, H. Dharma
    Muthulingam, Suresh
    [J]. PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2016, 25 (04) : 736 - 750
  • [2] Collaborative product and market development: Theoretical implications and experimental evidence
    Amaldoss, W
    Rapoport, A
    [J]. MARKETING SCIENCE, 2005, 24 (03) : 396 - 414
  • [3] Noncooperative versus cooperative R&D with endogenous spillover rates
    Amir, R
    Evstigneev, I
    Wooders, J
    [J]. GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2003, 42 (02) : 183 - 207
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2017, SCI REP UK
  • [5] Quick response strategy with cleaner technology in a supply chain: coordination and win-win situation analysis
    Chan, Hau-Ling
    Shen, Bin
    Cai, Yajun
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2018, 56 (10) : 3397 - 3408
  • [6] CHAN HL, 2019, IEEE T SYSTEMS MAN C
  • [7] Development of a cost-effective energy and water management system for small and medium-sized manufacturers
    Chen, Lizhu
    Shen, Bin
    Wu, Xiongying
    Ding, Xuemei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 153 (01) : 264 - 274
  • [8] Firms' green R&D cooperation behaviour in a supply chain: Technological spillover, power and coordination
    Chen, Xu
    Wang, Xiaojun
    Zhou, Mingmei
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2019, 218 : 118 - 134
  • [9] The Impact of Demand Uncertainty on Consumer Subsidies for Green Technology Adoption
    Cohen, Maxime C.
    Lobel, Ruben
    Perakis, Georgia
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2016, 62 (05) : 1235 - 1258
  • [10] COHEN MC, 2018, COMPETITION EXTERNAL