Effect of the shear intensity on fouling in submerged membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment

被引:64
|
作者
Delgado, S. [1 ]
Villarroel, R. [1 ]
Gonzalez, E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ La Laguna, Dept Chem Engn, Fac Chem, San Cristobal la Laguna 38200, Spain
关键词
submerged membrane bioreactor; ultrafiltration; hollow-fibre; membrane fouling; shear intensity;
D O I
10.1016/j.memsci.2007.12.019
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Air sparging is widely used to minimize membrane fouling within submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR) applied to wastewater treatment. This paper discusses its effectiveness in hollow-fibre membrane modules and its relationship with permeate flux, backwashing frequency and duration and main biomass characteristics. The effect of air sparging is expressed as shear intensity G which enables to describe the influence of several hydrodynamic parameters (viscosity, air sparging area and air flow-rate) on membrane fouling. The experimental study was carried out with sludge at four different biomass concentrations (MLSS = 4100-14,500 mg l(-1)) filtered under a broad range of hydrodynamic conditions (J = 20-63 l h(-1) m(-2); G=0-375s(-n)). Under constant filtration conditions, the slope of TMP against time, the fouling rate, is described by an exponential function of G: r(f) = (r(f))(0) exp(-(FGG)) + (r(f))(1), where shear intensity sensitivity factor (F-G) enables quantification of effectiveness of air sparging and limit fouling rate (rf), describes the fouling caused by adsorption of micro-colloidal and soluble fractions over the external membrane Surface. Also, it has been found that this sensitivity factor is a decreasing function of the imposed permeate flux and the biomass concentration. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 181
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of cyclic aeration on fouling in submerged membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment
    Wu, Jun
    He, Chengda
    WATER RESEARCH, 2012, 46 (11) : 3507 - 3515
  • [2] Pollutants removal effect and membrane fouling alleviating by an improved submerged membrane bioreactor for domestic wastewater treatment
    Wang Hong-jie
    Li Wei-guang
    Yang Yue
    Dong Wen-yi
    Bai Wei
    2009 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, VOLS 1-11, 2009, : 4650 - +
  • [3] Influence of relaxation modes on membrane fouling in submerged membrane bioreactor for domestic wastewater treatment
    Habib, Rasikh
    Asif, Muhammad Bilal
    Iftekhar, Sidra
    Khan, Zahiruddin
    Gurung, Khum
    Srivastava, Varsha
    Sillanpaa, Mika
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2017, 181 : 19 - 25
  • [4] Fouling behaviours of two membranes in a submerged membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment
    Wang, Pan
    Wang, Zhiwei
    Wu, Zhichao
    Mai, Suihai
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2011, 382 (1-2) : 60 - 69
  • [5] Insight into the performance and fouling characteristics of submerged ceramic membrane bioreactor in wastewater treatment
    You, Yujing
    Guo, Junyuan
    Jiang, Jianying
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2025, 373
  • [6] Study on membrane fouling of submerged membrane bioreactor in treating bathing wastewater
    Guo Jifeng
    Xia Siqing
    Wang Rongchang
    Zhao Jianfu
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2008, 20 (10) : 1158 - 1167
  • [8] Predicting Membrane Fouling of Submerged Membrane Bioreactor Wastewater Treatment Plants Using Machine Learning
    Zhu, Yunyi
    Wang, Yuan
    Zhu, Elisabeth
    Ma, Zeyu
    Wang, Hanchen
    Chen, Chunsheng
    Guan, Jing
    Waite, T. David
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2025,
  • [9] Membrane fouling properties in a submerged membrane bioreactor for saline wastewater treatment at high ammonium content
    An, Ying
    Wang, Zhiwei
    Li, Bin
    Wu, Zhichao
    Zhang, Yifan
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2015, 53 (07) : 1735 - 1743
  • [10] Submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor for low-strength wastewater treatment: Effect of HRT and SRT on treatment performance and membrane fouling
    Huang, Zhi
    Ong, Say L.
    Ng, How Y.
    WATER RESEARCH, 2011, 45 (02) : 705 - 713