Cervical myelopathy: clinical and neurophysiological evaluation

被引:36
作者
Dvorak, J
Sutter, M
Herdmann, J
机构
[1] Schulthess Clin Spine Unit, Dept Neurol, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Schulthess Clin Spine Unit, Dept Neurophysiol, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Dusseldorf, Dept Neurosurg, Spine Unit, D-4000 Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
cervical spine; myelopathy; diagnosis; evoked potentials;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-003-0631-y
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The overall frequency of troublesome neck pain is estimated to be about 34%, and it was observed that the frequency of complaints lasting I month or longer was higher in women than in men. The prevalence increased with age, with regard to both pain duration and chronic pain. Approximately 14% of a randomly selected population meets the criterion for chronic neck pain: complaints lasting more than 6 months. Epidemiologic data substantiate the importance of morphologic, age-related changes of the cervical spine; however, the incidence and prevalence of cervical myelopathy is not known. It could be that the structural transformation of the intervertebral disc, the uncovertebral processes and the zygapophyseal joints is a process accompanied by disturbed function that ultimately not only induces pain, but can lead to narrowing of spinal canal, with symptoms and signs of cervical myelopathy. For a diagnosis of radicular and myelopathic syndromes, the functional and neurological examination is enhanced by neurophysiological assessment. Electromyography (EMG) performed with needle electrodes is the oldest method for diagnosing nerve root compression and anterior horn cell syndromes, and is claimed to have no false-positive results. For cervical myelopathy, as a routine examination sensory evoked potentials (SEPs) by stimulation of tibial nerve and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from the upper and lower extremities are recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:S181 / S187
页数:7
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION OF THE MOTOR TRACTS IN CERVICAL SPONDYLOSIS
    ABBRUZZESE, G
    DALLAGATA, D
    MORENA, M
    SIMONETTI, S
    SPADAVECCHIA, L
    SEVERI, P
    CANDRIOLI, G
    FAVALE, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1988, 51 (06) : 796 - 802
  • [2] BARKER AT, 1985, LANCET, V1, P1106
  • [3] BARKER AT, 1985, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V369, pP3
  • [4] BENDARIK J, 1998, EUR SPINE J, V7, P493
  • [5] THE VALUE OF MAGNETIC STIMULATION IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF RADICULOPATHIES
    BISCHOFF, C
    MEYER, BU
    MACHETANZ, J
    CONRAD, B
    [J]. MUSCLE & NERVE, 1993, 16 (02) : 154 - 161
  • [6] CLINICAL USE OF THE MAGNETIC STIMULATOR IN THE INVESTIGATION OF PERIPHERAL CONDUCTION TIME
    BRITTON, TC
    MEYER, BU
    HERDMANN, J
    BENECKE, R
    [J]. MUSCLE & NERVE, 1990, 13 (05) : 396 - 406
  • [7] CADWELL J, 1989, MAGNETIC STIMULATION, P13
  • [8] Chomiak J, 1995, Eur Spine J, V4, P180, DOI 10.1007/BF00298243
  • [9] Crock H. V., 1977, BLOOD SUPPLY VERTEBR
  • [10] De Mattei M, 1993, Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol, V33, P205