Automatic breast density segmentation: an integration of different approaches

被引:46
作者
Kallenberg, Michiel G. J. [1 ]
Lokate, Mariette [2 ]
van Gils, Carla H. [2 ]
Karssemeijer, Nico [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, NL-6525 GA Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
MAMMOGRAPHIC PARENCHYMAL PATTERNS; CANCER RISK; FEATURE-SELECTION; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/56/9/005
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Mammographic breast density has been found to be a strong risk factor for breast cancer. In most studies, it is assessed with a user-assisted threshold method, which is time consuming and subjective. In this study, we develop a breast density segmentation method that is fully automatic. The method is based on pixel classification in which different approaches known in the literature to segment breast density are integrated and extended. In addition, the method incorporates the knowledge of a trained observer, by using segmentations obtained by the user-assisted threshold method as training data. The method is trained and tested using 1300 digitized film mammographic images acquired with a variety of systems. Results show a high correspondence between the automated method and the user-assisted threshold method. Pearson's correlation coefficient between our method and the user-assisted method is R = 0.911 for percent density and R = 0.895 for dense area, which is substantially higher than the best correlation found in the literature (R = 0.70, R = 0.68). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve obtained when discriminating between fatty and dense pixels is 0.987. A combination of segmentation strategies outperforms the application of single segmentation techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:2715 / 2729
页数:15
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Screen-Film Mammographic Density and Breast Cancer Risk: A Comparison of the Volumetric Standard Mammogram Form and the Interactive Threshold Measurement Methods [J].
Aitken, Zoe ;
McCormack, Valerie A. ;
Highnam, Ralph P. ;
Martin, Lisa ;
Gunasekara, Anoma ;
Melnichouk, Olga ;
Mawdsley, Gord ;
Peressotti, Chris ;
Yaffe, Martin ;
Boyd, Norman F. ;
Silva, Isabel dos Santos .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2010, 19 (02) :418-428
[2]  
[Anonymous], P MED IM UND AN
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1993, An introduction to the bootstrap
[4]  
Aylward SR, 1998, COMP IMAG VIS, V13, P305
[5]   Prospect-EPIC Utrecht: Study design and characteristics of the cohort population [J].
Boker, LK ;
van Noord, PAH ;
van der Schouw, YT ;
Koot, NVCM ;
de Mesquita, HBB ;
Riboli, E ;
Grobbee, DE ;
Peeters, PHM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 17 (11) :1047-1053
[6]   Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer [J].
Boyd, Norman F. ;
Guo, Helen ;
Martin, Lisa J. ;
Sun, Limei ;
Stone, Jennifer ;
Fishell, Eve ;
Jong, Roberta A. ;
Hislop, Greg ;
Chiarelli, Anna ;
Minkin, Salomon ;
Yaffe, Martin J. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 356 (03) :227-236
[7]   Breast Tissue Composition and Susceptibility to Breast Cancer [J].
Boyd, Norman F. ;
Martin, Lisa J. ;
Bronskill, Michael ;
Yaffe, Martin J. ;
Duric, Neb ;
Minkin, Salomon .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2010, 102 (16) :1224-1237
[8]   THE QUANTITATIVE-ANALYSIS OF MAMMOGRAPHIC DENSITIES [J].
BYNG, JW ;
BOYD, NF ;
FISHELL, E ;
JONG, RA ;
YAFFE, MJ .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1994, 39 (10) :1629-1638
[9]   Segmentation of the fibro-glandular disc in mammograms using Gaussian mixture modelling [J].
Ferrari, RJ ;
Rangayyan, RM ;
Borges, RA ;
Frère, AF .
MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 2004, 42 (03) :378-387
[10]  
Gong YC, 2006, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V4046, P616