Receiver operating characteristic surfaces in the presence of verification bias

被引:12
作者
Chi, Yueh-Yun [1 ]
Zhou, Xiao-Hua [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Epidemiol & Hlth Policy Res, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
Alzheimer's disease; jackknife; maximum likelihood estimate; ordinal tests;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-9876.2007.00597.x
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
In diagnostic medicine, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) surface is one of the established tools for assessing the accuracy of a diagnostic test in discriminating three disease states, and the volume under the ROC surface has served as a summary index for diagnostic accuracy. In practice, the selection for definitive disease examination may be based on initial test measurements and induces verification bias in the assessment. We propose a non-parametric likelihood-based approach to construct the empirical ROC surface in the presence of differential verification, and to estimate the volume under the ROC surface. Estimators of the standard deviation are derived by both the Fisher information and the jackknife method, and their relative accuracy is evaluated in an extensive simulation study. The methodology is further extended to incorporate discrete baseline covariates in the selection process, and to compare the accuracy of a pair of diagnostic tests. We apply the proposed method to compare the diagnostic accuracy between mini-mental state examination and clinical evaluation of dementia, in discriminating between three disease states of Alzheimer's disease.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 23
页数:23
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Agresti A., 1990, Analysis of categorical data
[2]   Assessing accuracy of a continuous screening test in the presence of verification bias [J].
Alonzo, TA ;
Pepe, MS .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C-APPLIED STATISTICS, 2005, 54 :173-190
[3]   ASSESSMENT OF DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS WHEN DISEASE VERIFICATION IS SUBJECT TO SELECTION BIAS [J].
BEGG, CB ;
GREENES, RA .
BIOMETRICS, 1983, 39 (01) :207-215
[4]   Comparing three-class diagnostic tests by three-way ROC analysis [J].
Dreiseitl, S ;
Ohno-Machado, L ;
Binder, M .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2000, 20 (03) :323-331
[5]  
Efron B., 1993, INTRO BOOTSTRAP MONO, DOI DOI 10.1201/9780429246593
[6]  
FOLSTEIN MF, 1975, J PSYCHIATR RES, V12, P198
[7]   CONSTRUCTION OF RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES WHEN DISEASE VERIFICATION IS SUBJECT TO SELECTION BIAS [J].
GRAY, R ;
BEGG, CB ;
GREENES, RA .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1984, 4 (02) :151-164
[8]   Multiple imputation for correcting verification bias [J].
Harel, Ofer ;
Zhou, Xiao-Hua .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2006, 25 (22) :3769-3786
[9]  
JUST S, 2004, PHARMOCOTHERAPHY UPD
[10]   Accounting for nonignorable verification bias in assessment of diagnostic tests [J].
Kosinski, AS ;
Barnhart, HX .
BIOMETRICS, 2003, 59 (01) :163-171