Sectional matrix solutions: the distorted truth

被引:15
作者
Bailey, Oliver [1 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Sch Dent Sci, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4BW, Tyne & Wear, England
关键词
PROXIMAL CONTACT TIGHTNESS; COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS; PLACEMENT; GINGIVAL; BIOFILM;
D O I
10.1038/s41415-021-3608-5
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Sectional matrix techniques offer more predictable solutions to achieving contact areas when placing direct interproximal posterior composites than circumferential matrix techniques, resulting in reduced reported complaints of food packing from patients. Despite this, a large majority of UK dentists and therapists don't currently use them. Sectional matrix systems are technique-sensitive to use, which can be a barrier to implementation for inexperienced users. The matrices can easily distort during their placement and stabilisation and when placing the restorative material. This can result in unwanted, clinically relevant problems in the resulting restorations, some of which may not be discernible once they have occurred. This paper explores the advantages and disadvantages of sectional matrices and the processes and techniques involved in their use, before discussing the potential for distortion at each step. It offers solutions to some of the commonly seen problems which will provide more predictable outcomes for those already using these techniques and encourage non-users to add them to their armamentarium.
引用
收藏
页码:547 / 555
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Amalgam Phase-Down Part 2: UK-Based Knowledge, Opinions, and Confidence in the Alternatives [J].
Bailey, O. ;
Vernazza, C. R. ;
Stone, S. ;
Ternent, L. ;
Roche, A. -G. ;
Lynch, C. .
JDR CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2022, 7 (01) :50-60
[2]   Amalgam Phase-Down Part 1: UK-Based Posterior Restorative Material and Technique Use [J].
Bailey, O. ;
Vernazza, C. R. ;
Stone, S. ;
Ternent, L. ;
Roche, A. -G. ;
Lynch, C. .
JDR CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2022, 7 (01) :41-49
[3]   Papilla management in sub-gingival, interproximal, direct composite restoration: a key step to success [J].
Bailey, Oliver ;
O'Connor, Christopher .
BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2019, 226 (12) :933-937
[4]  
Burke FJT, 1999, QUINTESSENCE INT, V30, P234
[5]  
Cazzaniga G, 2015, AM J DENT, V28, P311
[6]   Factors associated with the appearance of gingival papillae [J].
Chow, Yiu Cheung ;
Eber, Robert M. ;
Tsao, Yi-Pin ;
Shotwell, Jeffrey L. ;
Wang, Hom-Lay .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2010, 37 (08) :719-727
[7]   Morphological analysis of proximal contacts in class II direct restorations with 3D image reconstruction [J].
Chuang, Shu-Fen ;
Su, Kuo-Chih ;
Wang, Chun-Hsiang ;
Chang, Chih-Han .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2011, 39 (06) :448-456
[8]  
Czerwinski M., 2017, TEFLON FLOSS PREMOLA
[9]  
Durr-E-Sadaf, 2018, Indian J Dent Res, V29, P459, DOI 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_26_17
[10]   Proximal contact tightness of class II bulk-fill composite resin restorations: An in vitro study [J].
El-Shamy, Hassan ;
Sonbul, Helal ;
Alturkestani, Najlaa ;
Tashkandi, Abeer ;
Loomans, Bas A. C. ;
Doerfer, Christof ;
El-Badrawy, Wafa .
DENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL, 2019, 38 (01) :96-100