Tolerable or acceptable: A comparison of risk regulation in the United Kingdom and in the Netherlands

被引:79
作者
Ale, BJM [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, TBM Safety Sci, NL-2600 GA Delft, Netherlands
关键词
criteria; acceptability; law; policy; risk;
D O I
10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00585.x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
In managing major accident hazards in industry risk, both the United Kingdom and the Netherlands use quantitative risk analysis and quantified risk criteria. These should be understood in the historical, legal, and political context in which they were drawn up. Even when criteria are numerically the same they do not necessarily mean the same thing. The legal and historical context differs widely between the two countries. Nevertheless, it is surprising that the final results in terms of land use and levels of risk are very similar.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 241
页数:11
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1998, SOC RISKS
  • [2] Carter D.A., 1995, P 8 INT S LOSS PREV, VII, P219
  • [3] Farmer F.R., 1967, ATOM, V128, P152
  • [4] FARMER FR, 1967, NUCL SAFETY, V8, P539
  • [5] A note on F-n curves, expected numbers of fatalities, and weighted indicators of risk
    Hirst, IL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 1998, 57 (1-3) : 169 - 175
  • [6] HSE, 1989, RISK CRIT LAND US PL
  • [7] HSE, 1988, TOL RISK NUCL POW ST
  • [8] MELEIS M, 1972, NUCL SAFETY, V13, P22
  • [9] Factors in risk perception
    Sjöberg, L
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 2000, 20 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [10] Slovic P, 1999, RISK ANAL, V19, P689, DOI 10.1023/A:1007041821623