Monotonicity in Bargaining Networks

被引:0
|
作者
Azar, Yossi [1 ]
Devanur, Nikhil R. [1 ]
Jain, Kamal [1 ]
Rabani, Yuval [2 ]
机构
[1] Microsoft Res, 1 Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA 98052 USA
[2] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Dept Comp Sci, IL-32000 Haifa, Israel
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-FIRST ANNUAL ACM-SIAM SYMPOSIUM ON DISCRETE ALGORITHMS | 2010年 / 135卷
关键词
EXCHANGE NETWORKS; NUCLEOLUS; POWER; GAMES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
We study bargaining networks, discussed in a recent impel of Kleinberg and Tardos [KT08], nom the perspective of cooperative game theory. In particular we examine three solution concepts, the nucleolus, the core center and the core median. All solution concepts define unique solutions, so they provide testable predictions. We define a new monotonicity property that is a natural axiom of any bargaining game solution, and we prove that all three of them satisfy this monotonicity property. This is actually in contrast to the conventional wisdom for general cooperative games that monotonicity and the core condition (which is a basic property that all three of them satisfy) ale incompatible with each other. Our proofs are based on a primal-dual arugument (for the nucleolus) and on the PKG inequality (for the core center and the core median). We further observe sonic qualitative differences between the solution concepts. In particular, there are cases where a strict version of our monotonicity property is a natural axiom, but only the core center and the core median satisfy it On the other hand, the nucleolus is easy to compute, whereas computing the core center or the core median is #P-hard (yet it can be approximated in polynomial time)
引用
收藏
页码:817 / +
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Bargaining and Reputation: An Experiment on Bargaining in the Presence of Behavioural Types
    Embrey, Matthew
    Frechette, Guillaume R.
    Lehrer, Steven F.
    REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2015, 82 (02) : 608 - 631
  • [22] Power Allocation for Cooperative Localization in Decentralized Distributed Radar Networks: A Nash Bargaining Game Approach
    Jin, Biao
    Liu, Shujin
    Zhang, Zhenkai
    Lian, Zhuxian
    Wang, Biao
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AEROSPACE AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, 2025, 61 (01) : 4 - 16
  • [23] Design of Modern Supply Chain Networks Using Fuzzy Bargaining Game and Data Envelopment Analysis
    Cavone, Graziana
    Dotoli, Mariagrazia
    Epicoco, Nicola
    Morelli, Davide
    Seatzu, Carla
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATION SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2020, 17 (03) : 1221 - 1236
  • [24] Bargaining and membership
    Gomez-Rua, Maria
    Vidal-Puga, Juan
    TOP, 2014, 22 (02) : 800 - 814
  • [25] Bargaining and Bicameralism
    Parameswaran, Giri
    LEGISLATIVE STUDIES QUARTERLY, 2018, 43 (01) : 101 - 139
  • [26] Bargaining and News
    Daley, Brendan
    Green, Brett
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2020, 110 (02) : 428 - 474
  • [27] Bargaining with Mechanisms
    Peski, Marcin
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2022, 112 (06) : 2044 - 2082
  • [28] Bargaining Chains
    Lovejoy, William S.
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2010, 56 (12) : 2282 - 2301
  • [29] Initiating Bargaining
    Goldreich, David
    Pomorski, Lukasz
    REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2011, 78 (04) : 1299 - 1328
  • [30] Computation of equilibrium values in the Baron and Ferejohn bargaining model
    Kalandrakis, Tasos
    GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2015, 94 : 29 - 38