A group decision-making approach to uncertain quality function deployment based on fuzzy preference relation and fuzzy majority

被引:93
作者
Yan, Hong-Bin [1 ]
Ma, Tieju [1 ]
机构
[1] E China Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Business, Shanghai 200237, Peoples R China
关键词
Quality management; Uncertain QFD; Group decision-making approach; Fuzzy preference relation; Fuzzy majority; PRIORITIZE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; WEIGHTED AVERAGE; ENGINEERING CHARACTERISTICS; PROGRAMMING APPROACH; LINGUISTIC DATA; EXPECTED VALUE; QFD; MODELS; AGGREGATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2014.09.017
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Quality function deployment (QFD) is one of the very effective customer-driven quality system tools typically applied to fulfill customer needs or requirements (CRs). It is a crucial step in QFD to derive the prioritization of design requirements (DRs) from CRs for a product. However, effective prioritization of DRs is seriously challenged due to two types of uncertainties: human subjective perception and customer heterogeneity. This paper tries to propose a novel two-stage group decision-making approach to simultaneously address the two types of uncertainties underlying QFD. The first stage is to determine the fuzzy preference relations of different DRs with respect to each customer based on the order-based semantics of linguistic information. The second stage is to determine the prioritization of DRs by synthesizing all customers' fuzzy preference relations into an overall one by fuzzy majority. Two examples, a Chinese restaurant and a flexible manufacturing system, are used to illustrate the proposed approach. The restaurant example is also used to compare with three existing approaches. Implementation results show that the proposed approach can eliminate the burden of quantifying qualitative concepts and model customer heterogeneity and design team's preference. Due to its easiness, our approach can reduce the cognitive burden of QFD planning team and give a practical convenience in QFD planning. Extensions to the proposed approach are also given to address application contexts involving a wider set of HOQ elements. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:815 / 829
页数:15
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], FUZZY SETS THEIR EXT
[2]  
Chan L.K., 2002, Quality Engineering, V15, P23
[3]   Quality function deployment: A literature review [J].
Chan, LK ;
Wu, ML .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2002, 143 (03) :463-497
[4]   A systematic approach to quality function deployment with a full illustrative example [J].
Chan, LK ;
Wu, ML .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2005, 33 (02) :119-139
[5]   An evaluation approach to engineering design in QFD processes using fuzzy goal programming models [J].
Chen, LH ;
Weng, MC .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2006, 172 (01) :230-248
[6]   Fuzzy Approaches for Constructing House of Quality in QFD and Its Applications: A Group Decision-Making Method [J].
Chen, Liang-Hsuan ;
Ko, Wen-Chang ;
Tseng, Chien-Yao .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2013, 60 (01) :77-87
[7]   Fuzzy Nonlinear Models for New Product Development Using Four-Phase Quality Function Deployment Processes [J].
Chen, Liang-Hsuan ;
Ko, Wen-Chang .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS, 2011, 41 (05) :927-945
[8]   Fuzzy linear programming models for NPD using a four-phase QFD activity process based on the means-end chain concept [J].
Chen, Liang-Hsuan ;
Ko, Wen-Chang .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2010, 201 (02) :619-632
[9]   Rating technical attributes in fuzzy QFD by integrating fuzzy weighted average method and fuzzy expected value operator [J].
Chen, Yizeng ;
Fung, Richard Y. K. ;
Tang, Jiafu .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2006, 174 (03) :1553-1566
[10]   Key factors in the successful application of quality function deployment (QFD) [J].
Cristiano, JJ ;
Liker, JK ;
White, CC .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2001, 48 (01) :81-95