The impact of single positive surgical margin features on biochemical recurrence after robotic radical prostatectomy

被引:1
作者
Evren, Ismail [1 ]
Haciislamoglu, Ahmet [1 ]
Eksi, Mithat [1 ]
Yavuzsan, Abdullah Hizir [1 ]
Baytekin, Firat [2 ]
Colakoglu, Yunus [1 ]
Canoglu, Didem [2 ]
Tugcu, Volkan [1 ]
机构
[1] Bakirkoy Dr Sadi Konuk Training & Res Hosp, Dept Urol, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Bakirkoy Dr Sadi Konuk Training & Res Hosp, Dept Pathol, Istanbul, Turkey
来源
INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL | 2019年 / 45卷 / 01期
关键词
Margins of Excision; Prostatectomy; Pathology; RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE; GLEASON SCORE; CANCER; SITE; PROGRESSION; FAILURE; PREDICTOR; LOCATION; MATTER;
D O I
10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0702
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Parameters predictive of biochemical or clinical recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy (RP) were determined as pre-treatment PSA value, pathologic tumor stage, tumor grade and presence of Positive Surgical Margin (PSM), extracapsular extension and seminal vesicle invasion and the status of pelvic lymph nodes. The aim of our study is to evaluate the effect of additional features in patients undergoing RP in our clinic. Materials and Methods: We studied 556 RP operations performed between 2009 and 2016 for prostate cancer at this clinic. Preoperative and postoperative data of the patients were retrospectively reviewed. RP specimens were examined by two pathologists specialized in this subject. Of these patients, 78 (14.02%) patients with PSM were included in the study. The pathology slides of these patients were reassessed. The length of PSM (mm), localization (apex, basis and posterolateral) and Gleason pattern at this margin was determined and statistical correlations with BCR were calculated. Results: The mean follow-up after the RP of 41 patients included in the study was 37.4 +/- 13.2 months. During the follow-up period of the patients, BCR was observed in 16 patients (39.02 0 /0. No statistically significant difference was observed in age and prostate volume between the groups with and without BCR development (p > 0.05). Preoperative PSA level was found to be statistically significantly higher in the group with BCR development compared to the group without recurrence (p = 0.004). In-group comparisons in each aforementioned Gleason score groups were performed in terms of BCR development and the preoperative Gleason score in the group with development of recurrence was found to be statistically significantly higher compared to the group without recurrence (p = 0.007). The length of the surgical margin was measured as 7.4 +/- 4.4 mm in the BCR-developing group and 4.7 +/- 3.8 mm in the no-BCR- developing group; it was statistically significantly higher in the group with development of recurrence (p = 0.03). Conclusion: Length and location of the PSM and the Gleason score detected in the PSM region could not predict biochemical recurrence according to the results of this present study. However high preoperative PSA value is an independent prognostic factor for biochemical recurrence.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 53
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Impact of Positive Surgical Margins After Radical Prostatectomy Differs by Disease Risk Group [J].
Alkhateeb, Sultan ;
Alibhai, Shabbir ;
Fleshner, Neil ;
Finelli, Antonio ;
Jewett, Michael ;
Zlotta, Alexandre ;
Nesbitt, Michael ;
Lockwood, Gina ;
Trachtenberg, John .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (01) :145-150
[2]   Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy [J].
Blute, ML ;
Bostwick, DG ;
Bergstralh, EJ ;
Slezak, JM ;
Martin, SK ;
Amling, CL ;
Zincke, H .
UROLOGY, 1997, 50 (05) :733-739
[3]   The Gleason Score of Tumor at the Margin in Radical Prostatectomy is Predictive of Biochemical Recurrence [J].
Cao, Dengfeng ;
Kibel, Adam S. ;
Gao, Feng ;
Tao, Yu ;
Humphrey, Peter A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2010, 34 (07) :994-1001
[4]   Predictive Factors for Positive Surgical Margins and Their Locations After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy [J].
Coelho, Rafael F. ;
Chauhan, Sanket ;
Orvieto, Marcelo A. ;
Palmer, Kenneth J. ;
Rocco, Bernardo ;
Patel, Vipul R. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2010, 57 (06) :1022-1029
[5]  
EPSTEIN JI, 1993, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V71, P3582, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19930601)71:11<3582::AID-CNCR2820711120>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-Y
[7]   Prognostic implications of a positive apical margin in radical prostatectomy specimens [J].
Fesseha, T ;
Sakr, W ;
Grignon, D ;
Banerjee, M ;
Wood, DP ;
Pontes, JE .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 158 (06) :2176-2179
[8]   Predictors of Positive Surgical Margins After Laparoscopic Robot Assisted Radical Prostatectomy [J].
Ficarra, Vincenzo ;
Novara, Giacomo ;
Secco, Silvia ;
D'Elia, Carolina ;
Boscolo-Berto, Rafael ;
Gardiman, Marina ;
Cavalleri, Stefano ;
Artibani, Walter .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 182 (06) :2682-2688
[9]   Impact of margin size on the incidence of local residual tumor after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy [J].
Fromont, G ;
Cathelineau, X ;
Rozet, F ;
Prapotnich, D ;
Validire, P ;
Vallancien, G .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 172 (05) :1845-1847
[10]   Correlation between cancer location and oncological outcome after radical prostatectomy [J].
Hashine, Katsuyoshi ;
Ueno, Yoshiteru ;
Shinomori, Kensuke ;
Ninomiya, Iku ;
Teramoto, Norihiro ;
Yamashita, Natsumi .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 19 (09) :855-860