PET Imaging of Estrogen Receptors as a Diagnostic Tool for Breast Cancer Patients Presenting with a Clinical Dilemma

被引:140
作者
van Kruchten, Michel [1 ]
Glaudemans, Andor W. J. M. [2 ]
de Vries, Erik F. J. [2 ]
Beets-Tan, Regina G. H. [3 ]
Schroder, Carolien P. [1 ]
Dierckx, Rudi A. [2 ]
de Vries, Elisabeth G. E. [1 ]
Hospers, Geke A. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Med Oncol, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Nucl Med & Mol Imaging, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
estrogen receptor; imaging; breast cancer; F-18-FES PET; clinical value; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; METABOLIC FLARE; HETEROGENEITY; EXPRESSION;
D O I
10.2967/jnumed.111.092734
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
16 alpha-F-18-fluoro-17 beta-estradiol (F-18-FES) is an estrogen receptor (ER)-specific PET tracer with various potential interesting applications. The precise contribution of this technique in current clinical practice, however, has yet to be determined. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the value of F-18-FES PET in breast cancer patients presenting with a clinical dilemma. Methods: F-18-FES PET examination could be requested by referring physicians for patients with a history of ER-positive breast cancer and the presence of a clinical dilemma despite complete standard work-up. All requests for F-18-FES PET required a positive arbitration by a dedicated medical oncologist and nuclear medicine physician. The referring physician was asked to fill in validated questionnaires before, shortly after, and at more than 3 mo after F-18-FES PET to determine indication, diagnostic value, and therapeutic consequences of F-18-FES PET. To further validate F-18-FES PET findings, F-18-FES PET lesions were quantified and compared with centrally reviewed conventional imaging. Results: Thirty-three patients underwent F-18-FES PET between December 2008 and October 2010. F-18-FES PET was requested to evaluate equivocal lesions on conventional work-up (n = 21), ER status in metastatic patients (n = 10), and the origin of metastases (n = 2). F-18-FES-positive lesions were observed in 22 patients. F-18-FES PET was especially sensitive for bone metastases, detecting 341 bone lesions, compared with 246 by conventional imaging. The sensitivity for liver metastases was poor, and quantification of F-18-FES uptake in liver lesions was hampered by high physiologic background. F-18-FES uptake was highly variable between all metastases (range of standardized uptake value, 1.20-18.81), and 45% of the patients with a positive F-18-FES PET finding had both F-18-FES-positive and F-18-FES-negative metastases. F-18-FES PET improved diagnostic understanding in 88% of the patients and led to therapy change in 48% of the patients. Conclusion: With the exception of liver metastases, whole-body imaging of ER expression with F-18-FES PET can be a valuable additional diagnostic tool when standard work-up is inconclusive. F-18-FES PET supported therapy decisions by improving diagnostic understanding and providing information on ER status of tumor lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:182 / 190
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Allred DC, 1998, MODERN PATHOL, V11, P155
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, CANCER
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2019, NCCN CLIN PRACTICE G
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, J CLIN ONCOL, DOI DOI 10.1200/JCO.2010.28.15_SUPPL.1007
[5]   Commonly used imaging techniques for diagnosis and staging [J].
Barentsz, Jelle ;
Takahashi, Satoru ;
Oyen, Wim ;
Mus, Roel ;
De Mulder, Pieter ;
Reznek, Rodney ;
Oudkerk, Matthijs ;
Mali, Wim .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (20) :3234-3244
[6]   ONCOPOOL - A European database for 16,944 cases of breast cancer [J].
Blamey, R. W. ;
Hornmark-Stenstam, B. ;
Ball, G. ;
Blichert-Toft, M. ;
Cataliotti, L. ;
Fourquet, A. ;
Gee, J. ;
Holli, K. ;
Jakesz, R. ;
Kerin, M. ;
Mansel, R. ;
Nicholson, R. ;
Pienkowski, T. ;
Pinder, S. ;
Sundquist, M. ;
van de Vijver, M. ;
Ellis, I. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2010, 46 (01) :56-71
[7]   FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0 [J].
Boellaard, Ronald ;
O'Doherty, Mike J. ;
Weber, Wolfgang A. ;
Mottaghy, Felix M. ;
Lonsdale, Markus N. ;
Stroobants, Sigrid G. ;
Oyen, Wim J. G. ;
Kotzerke, Joerg ;
Hoekstra, Otto S. ;
Pruim, Jan ;
Marsden, Paul K. ;
Tatsch, Klaus ;
Hoekstra, Corneline J. ;
Visser, Eric P. ;
Arends, Bertjan ;
Verzijlbergen, Fred J. ;
Zijlstra, Josee M. ;
Comans, Emile F. I. ;
Lammertsma, Adriaan A. ;
Paans, Anne M. ;
Willemsen, Antoon T. ;
Beyer, Thomas ;
Bockisch, Andreas ;
Schaefer-Prokop, Cornelia ;
Delbeke, Dominique ;
Baum, Richard P. ;
Chiti, Arturo ;
Krause, Bernd J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2010, 37 (01) :181-200
[8]   Locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up [J].
Cardoso, F. ;
Senkus-Konefka, E. ;
Fallowfield, L. ;
Costa, A. ;
Castiglione, M. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2010, 21 :v15-v19
[9]   Quantitative analysis of estrogen receptor heterogeneity in breast cancer [J].
Chung, Gina G. ;
Zerkowski, Maciej P. ;
Ghosh, Sriparna ;
Camp, Robert L. ;
Rimm, David L. .
LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2007, 87 (07) :662-669
[10]   Relevance of breast cancer hormone receptors and other factors to the efficacy of adjuvant tamoxifen: patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials [J].
Davies, C. ;
Godwin, J. ;
Gray, R. ;
Clarke, M. ;
Darby, S. ;
McGale, P. ;
Wang, Y. C. ;
Peto, R. ;
Pan, H. C. ;
Cutter, D. ;
Taylor, C. ;
Ingle, J. .
LANCET, 2011, 378 (9793) :771-784