EARLY DIALOGUE WITH HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT BODIES: A EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVE

被引:11
作者
Cuche, Matthieu [1 ]
Beckerman, Rachel [2 ]
Chowdhury, Cyrus A.
van Weelden, Marije A.
机构
[1] Covidien, CH-8050 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] CBPartners, Value Demonstrat, New York, NY 10005 USA
关键词
Reimbursement; Decision making; Technology assessment; Biomedical/economics; Health policy/economics; Insurance; Health; Reimbursement/economics; Scientific consultation; Early dialogue; Clinical development; Market access;
D O I
10.1017/S0266462314000713
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Evidence requirements may differ across HTA bodies, and so pharmaceutical companies must plan to synergize their evidence generation strategy, across global regulatory and HTA bodies. Until recently, companies had no official platform to discuss the clinical development of a drug with HTA bodies; however, this is changing. Objectives: To achieve broad usage in the EU, products must achieve both regulatory and reimbursement approval, the latter of which is based on HTA appraisal in many markets. The objective of this study is to present and evaluate the different options available for early HTA consultation (during drug development/Phase III) in the major European markets from the industry perspective. Methods: An exploratory (nonsystematic) literature review was performed to identify the European markets offering early HTA consultations, and each process was analyzed using a set of predefined metrics that are relevant to industry (the ability to consult with the regulatory body in parallel, consultation fees, length of consultation meeting, language of consultation meeting, maximum number of pharmaceutical company employees attending, procedural timelines, nature of data for which consultative advice can be sought, the output of the process, and the ability to involve external experts). Results: Four different types of early HTA consultation processes were identified across the major European HTA markets. The nature of these processes varied in terms of the types and number of questions that can be addressed, the length of the meeting, the reporting output, and the ability to involve external experts. Conclusions: The availability of various options for early HTA consultation may help to avoid a mismatch between the evidence generated by means of a product's clinical development program, and the evidence expected by HTA bodies and payers, which can facilitate the pricing and reimbursement process upon a product's market authorization.
引用
收藏
页码:571 / 578
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Early Dialogue Between the Developers of New Technologies and Pricing and Reimbursement Agencies: A Pilot Study [J].
Backhouse, Martin E. ;
Wonder, Michael ;
Hornby, Edward ;
Kilburg, Anne ;
Drummond, Michael ;
Mayer, Friedrich Karl .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (04) :608-615
[2]  
Beckerman R, 2012, PAYER PROPHECY PRICI
[3]  
Bruce F, 2013, NO HOPE BI LILLYS TR
[4]  
College voor zorgverezekeringen, 2013, CVZ SCI ADV
[5]  
Dental and Pharmaceutical Benefits Board (TLV), 2010, JOINT SCI ADV M DENT
[6]  
EUnetHTA, 2013, FIN MIN EMA EUNETHTA
[7]  
European Medicines Agency, 2011, YERV
[8]  
Federal Joint Committee, 2011, BEN ASS PHARM ACC GE
[9]  
Gemeinsame Bundesausschuss, 2012, BESCHL NUTZ ARZN NEU
[10]   Harmonization of evidence requirements for health technology assessment in reimbursement decision making [J].
Hutton, John ;
Trueman, Paul ;
Facey, Karen .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2008, 24 (04) :511-517