Co-culture systems of osteoblasts and osteoclasts: Simulating in vitro bone remodeling in regenerative approaches

被引:135
作者
Borciani, Giorgia [1 ,3 ]
Montalbano, Giorgia [3 ]
Baldini, Nicola [1 ,2 ]
Cerqueni, Giorgia [4 ]
Vitale-Brovarone, Chiara [3 ]
Ciapetti, Gabriela [1 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS Ist Ortoped Rizzoli, Lab Orthopaed Pathophysiol & Regenerat Med, Via Barbiano 1-10, Bologna 40136, Italy
[2] Univ Bologna, Dept Biomed & Neuromotor Sci, Bologna, Italy
[3] Politecn Torino, Dept Appl Sci & Technol, Corso Duca Abruzzi 24, Turin 10129, Italy
[4] Univ Politecn Marche, Dept Clin & Mol Sci DISCLIMO, Via Tronto 10-A, Ancona 60020, Italy
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Co-culture; Bone; Osteoblasts; Osteoclasts; Bone engineering; MESENCHYMAL STEM-CELLS; MARROW STROMAL CELLS; BLOOD MONONUCLEAR-CELLS; HUMAN ADIPOSE-TISSUE; REVERSAL-CELLS; CULTURE MODEL; OSTEOGENIC DIFFERENTIATION; REGULATORY MECHANISMS; 3-DIMENSIONAL MODEL; GROWTH-FACTOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.actbio.2020.03.043
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Bone is an extremely dynamic tissue, undergoing continuous remodeling for its whole lifetime, but its regeneration or augmentation due to bone loss or defects are not always easy to obtain. Bone tissue engineering (BTE) is a promising approach, and its success often relies on a "smart" scaffold, as a support to host and guide bone formation through bone cell precursors. Bone homeostasis is maintained by osteoblasts (OBs) and osteoclasts (OCs) within the basic multicellular unit, in a consecutive cycle of resorption and formation. Therefore, a functional scaffold should allow the best possible OB/OC cooperation for bone remodeling, as happens within the bone extracellular matrix in the body. In the present work OB/OC co-culture models, with and without scaffolds, are reviewed. These experimental systems are intended for different targets, including bone remodeling simulation, drug testing and the assessment of biomaterials and 3D scaffolds for BTE. As a consequence, several parameters, such as cell type, cell ratio, culture medium and inducers, culture times and setpoints, assay methods, etc. vary greatly. This review identifies and systematically reports the in vitro methods explored up to now, which, as they allow cellular communication, more closely resemble bone remodeling and/or the regeneration process in the framework of BTE. Statement of significance Bone is a dynamic tissue under continuous remodeling, but spontaneous healing may fail in the case of excessive bone loss which often requires valid alternatives to conventional treatments to restore bone integrity, like bone tissue engineering (BTE). Pre-clinical evaluation of scaffolds for BTE requires in vitro testing where co-cultures combining innovative materials with osteoblasts (OBs) and osteoclasts (OCs) closely mimic the in vivo repair process. This review considers the direct and indirect OB/OC co-cultures relevant to BTE, from the early mouse-cell models to the recent bone regenerative systems. The co-culture modeling of bone microenvironment provides reliable information on bone cell cross-talk. Starting from improved knowledge on bone remodeling, bone disease mechanisms may be understood and new BTE solutions are designed. (C) 2020 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 45
页数:24
相关论文
共 223 条
  • [1] Characterization of Mononucleated Human Peripheral Blood Cells
    Ab Kadir, Ruzanna
    Ariffin, Shahrul Hisham Zainal
    Wahab, RohayaMegat Abdul
    Kermani, Shabnam
    Senafi, Sahidan
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC WORLD JOURNAL, 2012,
  • [2] Early reversal cells in adult human bone remodeling: osteoblastic nature, catabolic functions and interactions with osteoclasts
    Abdelgawad, Mohamed Essameldin
    Delaisse, Jean-Marie
    Hinge, Maja
    Jensen, Pia Rosgaard
    Alnaimi, Ragad Walid
    Rolighed, Lars
    Engelholm, Lars H.
    Marcussen, Niels
    Andersen, Thomas Levin
    [J]. HISTOCHEMISTRY AND CELL BIOLOGY, 2016, 145 (06) : 603 - 615
  • [3] New generation of bioreactors that advance extracellular matrix modelling and tissue engineering
    Ahmed, Shehnaz
    Chauhan, Veeren M.
    Ghaemmaghami, Amir M.
    Aylott, Jonathan W.
    [J]. BIOTECHNOLOGY LETTERS, 2019, 41 (01) : 1 - 25
  • [4] In vivo cellular reactions to different biomaterials-Physiological and pathological aspects and their consequences
    Al-Maawi, Sarah
    Orlowska, Anna
    Sader, Robert
    Kirkpatrick, C. James
    Ghanaati, Shahram
    [J]. SEMINARS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2017, 29 : 49 - 61
  • [5] Quantifying Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Mononuclear Cell Fraction of Bone Marrow Samples Obtained for Cell Therapy
    Alvarez-Viejo, M.
    Menendez-Menendez, Y.
    Blanco-Gelaz, M. A.
    Ferrero-Gutierrez, A.
    Fernandez-Rodriguez, M. A.
    Gala, J.
    Otero-Hernandez, J.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2013, 45 (01) : 434 - 439
  • [6] Amini Ami R., 2012, Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, V40, P363
  • [7] Understanding Coupling between Bone Resorption and Formation Are Reversal Cells the Missing Link?
    Andersen, Thomas L.
    Abdelgawad, Mohamed E.
    Kristensen, Helene B.
    Hauge, Ellen M.
    Rolighed, Lars
    Bollerslev, Jens
    Kjaersgaard-Andersen, Per
    Delaisse, Jean-Marie
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2013, 183 (01) : 235 - 246
  • [8] Concise Review: Mesenchymal Stem Cells: From Roots to Boost
    Andrzejewska, Anna
    Lukomska, Barbara
    Janowski, Miroslaw
    [J]. STEM CELLS, 2019, 37 (07) : 855 - 864
  • [9] Regulation of hematopoietic stem cells by bone marrow stromal cells
    Anthony, Bryan A.
    Link, Daniel C.
    [J]. TRENDS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2014, 35 (01) : 32 - 37
  • [10] Human trabecular bone-derived osteoblasts support human osteoclast formation in vitro in a defined, serum-free medium
    Atkins, GJ
    Kostakis, P
    Welldon, KJ
    Vincent, C
    Findlay, DM
    Zannettino, ACW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 203 (03) : 573 - 582