Variability of snow depth at the plot scale: implications for mean depth estimation and sampling strategies

被引:63
作者
Lopez-Moreno, J. I. [1 ]
Fassnacht, S. R. [2 ]
Begueria, S. [3 ]
Latron, J. B. P. [4 ]
机构
[1] CSIC, Inst Pirena Ecol, E-50080 Zaragoza, Spain
[2] Colorado State Univ, Warner Coll Nat Resources, Watershed Sci Program, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[3] CSIC, Estn Expt Aula Dei, Zaragoza 50016, Spain
[4] Inst Environm Assessment & Water Res IDAEA CSIC, Hydrol & Eros Grp, Barcelona 08028, Spain
关键词
SPATIAL-DISTRIBUTION; WATER EQUIVALENCE; COLORADO; INTERPOLATION; ACCUMULATION; TELEMETRY; DENSITY; FOREST; POINT; MODEL;
D O I
10.5194/tc-5-617-2011
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Snow depth variability over small distances can affect the representativeness of depth samples taken at the local scale, which are often used to assess the spatial distribution of snow at regional and basin scales. To assess spatial variability at the plot scale, intensive snow depth sampling was conducted during January and April 2009 in 15 plots in the Rio Esera Valley, central Spanish Pyrenees Mountains. Each plot (10 x 10 m; 100 m(2)) was subdivided into a grid of 1 m(2) squares; sampling at the corners of each square yielded a set of 121 data points that provided an accurate measure of snow depth in the plot (considered as ground truth). The spatial variability of snow depth was then assessed using sampling locations randomly selected within each plot. The plots were highly variable, with coefficients of variation up to 0.25. This indicates that to improve the representativeness of snow depth sampling in a given plot the snow depth measurements should be increased in number and averaged when spatial heterogeneity is substantial. Snow depth distributions were simulated at the same plot scale under varying levels of standard deviation and spatial autocorrelation, to enable the effect of each factor on snowpack representativeness to be established. The results showed that the snow depth estimation error increased markedly as the standard deviation increased. The results indicated that in general at least five snow depth measurements should be taken in each plot to ensure that the estimation error is <10%; this applied even under highly heterogeneous conditions. In terms of the spatial configuration of the measurements, the sampling strategy did not impact on the snow depth estimate under lack of spatial autocorrelation. However, with a high spatial autocorrelation a smaller error was obtained when the distance between measurements was greater.
引用
收藏
页码:617 / 629
页数:13
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Micro-scale spatial variability and the timing of snow melt runoff in a high mountain catchment [J].
Anderton, SP ;
White, SM ;
Alvera, B .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2002, 268 (1-4) :158-176
[2]   ROBUST LOCALLY WEIGHTED REGRESSION AND SMOOTHING SCATTERPLOTS [J].
CLEVELAND, WS .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1979, 74 (368) :829-836
[3]  
Cline D, 1998, HYDROL PROCESS, V12, P1527, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199808/09)12:10/11<1527::AID-HYP678>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-E
[5]  
Cressie N., 1993, Statistics for Spatial Data, DOI [10.1002/9781119115151, DOI 10.1002/9781119115151]
[6]   Fractal distribution of snow depth from lidar data [J].
Deems, JS ;
Fassnacht, SR ;
Elder, KJ .
JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2006, 7 (02) :285-297
[7]   A comparison of snow telemetry and snow course measurements in the Colorado River basin [J].
Dressler, K. A. ;
Fassnacht, S. R. ;
Bales, R. C. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2006, 7 (04) :705-712
[8]  
Edward H., 1989, INTRO APPL GEOSTATIS
[9]  
Elder K, 1998, HYDROL PROCESS, V12, P1793, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199808/09)12:10/11<1793::AID-HYP695>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-K