Additional Cavity Shaving at the Time of Breast-Conserving Surgery Enhances Accuracy of Margin Status Examination

被引:13
作者
Pata, Giacomo [1 ]
Bartoli, Michele [2 ]
Bianchi, Anna [1 ]
Pasini, Mario [1 ]
Roncali, Stefano [1 ]
Ragni, Fulvio [1 ]
机构
[1] Brescia Civ Hosp, Div Gen Surg 2, Dept Med & Surg Sci, Brescia, Italy
[2] Univ Brescia, Div Gen Surg 2, Dept Med & Surg Sci, Sch Med, Brescia, Italy
关键词
AMERICAN SOCIETY; LOCAL RECURRENCE; LUMPECTOMY; IRRADIATION; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1245/s10434-016-5210-7
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
We addressed the impact of separate cavity margin excision (shaving) during breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for breast cancer on specimen volume, tumor margin clearance, re-excision rate, local recurrence and survival. A retrospective case-matched study was performed on 298 women with stage 0-III breast cancer; 179 patients received shaving (shaving + lumpectomy group; SLG) and 119 patients did not (lumpectomy group; LG). The two groups had similar baseline characteristics. The median volume of surgical specimen was 131.9 cc in the SLG versus 134.8 cc in the LG (p = 0.81), and surgical margins were tumor-free in 90.7 % of cases in the LG versus 92.7 % in the SLG (87.1 % before shaving) (p = 0.69). The re-excision rate was 14.3 % in the LG versus 10.6 % in the SLG (p = 0.44). In the SLG, shaving spared 10 (5.6 %) patients from reoperation (positive lumpectomy margins but tumor-free shaving margins) (p = 0.11), and only 2/19 (10.5 %) patients in the SLG had tumor-free response at histological examination of re-excised margins compared with 10/17 (58.8 %) cases in the LG (p = 0.004). Tumor in shavings was found in 44/156 (28.2 %) patients having tumor-free lumpectomy margins. At multivariate analysis, distance of tumor from lumpectomy margins, tumor multifocality, receptor status, and tumor size were related to tumor persistence in shavings. Median follow-up was 27 months (range 23-35), and two patients had tumor relapse in the SLG versus none in the LG (p = 0.16). Overall survival was 100 % in both groups. Shaving does not significantly decrease the re-excision rate but provides wider clear margins in most procedures. It ensures more accurate margin examination and decreases false-positive margin rate, without any increase in removed breast-tissue volume.
引用
收藏
页码:2802 / 2808
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery With Whole-Breast Irradiation in Stage I and II Invasive Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Endorsement of the Society of Surgical Oncology/American Society for Radiation Oncology Consensus Guideline [J].
Buchholz, Thomas A. ;
Somerfield, Mark R. ;
Griggs, Jennifer J. ;
El-Eid, Souzan ;
Hammond, M. Elizabeth H. ;
Lyman, Gary H. ;
Mason, Ginny ;
Newman, Lisa A. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (14) :1502-+
[2]   Minimizing local recurrence after breast conserving therapy using intraoperative shaved margins to determine pathologic tumor clearance [J].
Camp, ER ;
McAuliffe, PF ;
Gilroy, JS ;
Morris, CG ;
Lind, DS ;
Mendenhall, NP ;
Copeland, EM .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2005, 201 (06) :855-861
[3]   A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Cavity Shave Margins in Breast Cancer [J].
Chagpar, Anees B. ;
Killelea, Brigid K. ;
Tsangaris, Theodore N. ;
Butler, Meghan ;
Stavris, Karen ;
Li, Fangyong ;
Yao, Xiaopan ;
Bossuyt, Veerle ;
Harigopal, Malini ;
Lannin, Donald R. ;
Pusztai, Lajos ;
Horowitz, Nina R. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2015, 373 (06) :503-510
[4]   A pathologic assessment of adequate margin status in breast-conserving therapy [J].
Dillon, MF ;
Hill, ADK ;
Quinn, CM ;
McDermott, EW ;
O'Higgins, N .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 13 (03) :333-339
[5]   Understanding the mechanisms creating false positive lumpectomy margins [J].
Dooley, WC ;
Parker, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 190 (04) :606-608
[6]   Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10 801 women in 17 randomised trials [J].
Darby S. ;
McGale P. ;
Correa C. ;
Taylor C. ;
Arriagada R. ;
Clarke M. ;
Cutter D. ;
Davies C. ;
Ewertz M. ;
Godwin J. ;
Gray R. ;
Pierce L. ;
Whelan T. ;
Wang Y. ;
Peto R. ;
Albain K. ;
Anderson S. ;
Barlow W. ;
Bergh J. ;
Bliss J. ;
Buyse M. ;
Cameron D. ;
Carrasco E. ;
Coates A. ;
Collins R. ;
Costantino J. ;
Cuzick J. ;
Davidson N. ;
Davies K. ;
Delmestri A. ;
Di Leo A. ;
Dowsett M. ;
Elphinstone P. ;
Evans V. ;
Gelber R. ;
Gettins L. ;
Geyer C. ;
Goldhirsch A. ;
Gregory C. ;
Hayes D. ;
Hill C. ;
Ingle J. ;
Jakesz R. ;
James S. ;
Kaufmann M. ;
Kerr A. ;
MacKinnon E. ;
McHugh T. ;
Norton L. ;
Ohashi Y. .
LANCET, 2011, 378 (9804) :1707-1716
[7]   Interest in cavity shaving in breast conservative treatment does not depend on lumpectomy technique [J].
Feron, J-G. ;
Nguyen, A. ;
Bezu, C. ;
Antoine, M. ;
Darai, E. ;
Coutant, C. ;
Rouzier, R. ;
Uzan, S. .
BREAST, 2011, 20 (04) :358-364
[8]   Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer [J].
Fisher, B ;
Anderson, S ;
Bryant, J ;
Margolese, RG ;
Deutsch, M ;
Fisher, ER ;
Jeong, J ;
Wolmark, N .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 347 (16) :1233-1241
[9]   The pancake phenomenon contributes to the inaccuracy of margin assessment in patients with breast cancer [J].
Graham, RA ;
Homer, MJ ;
Katz, J ;
Rothschild, J ;
Safaii, H ;
Supran, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 184 (02) :89-93
[10]   Systematic cavity shaving: Modifications of breast cancer management and long-term local recurrence, a multicentre study [J].
Hequet, D. ;
Bricou, A. ;
Koual, M. ;
Ziol, M. ;
Feron, J. G. ;
Rouzier, R. ;
Brouland, J. P. ;
Delpech, Y. ;
Barranger, E. .
EJSO, 2013, 39 (08) :899-905