Versatile sequential sampling algorithm using Kernel Density Estimation

被引:8
作者
Roy, Pamphile T. [1 ]
Jofre, Lluis [2 ]
Jouhaud, Jean-Christophe [1 ]
Cuenot, Benedicte [1 ]
机构
[1] CERFACS, CFD Team, 42 Ave Gaspard Coriolis, F-31057 Toulouse 1, France
[2] Stanford Univ, Ctr Turbulence Res, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
Stochastic processes; Design of experiments; Discrepancy; Optimal design; Uncertainty quantification; SPACE-FILLING DESIGNS; UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2019.11.070
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Understanding the physical mechanisms governing scientific and engineering systems requires performing experiments. Therefore, the construction of the Design of Experiments (DoE) is paramount for the successful inference of the intrinsic behavior of such systems. There is a vast literature on one-shot designs such as low discrepancy sequences and Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS). However, in a sensitivity analysis context, an important property is the stochasticity of the DoE which is partially addressed by these methods. This work proposes a new stochastic, iterative DoE - named KDOE - based on a modified Kernel Density Estimation (KDE). It is a two-step process: (i) candidate samples are generated using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) based on KDE, and (ii) one of them is selected based on some metric. The performance of the method is assessed by means of the C-2-discrepancy space-filling criterion. KDOE appears to be as performant as classical one-shot methods in low dimensions, while it presents increased performance for high-dimensional parameter spaces. It is a versatile method which offers an alternative to classical methods and, at the same time, is easy to implement and offers customization based on the objective of the DoE. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 211
页数:11
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Measures of uniformity in experimental designs: A selective overview [J].
Androulakis, E. ;
Drosou, K. ;
Koukouvinos, C. ;
Zhou, Y. -D. .
COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-THEORY AND METHODS, 2016, 45 (13) :3782-3806
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, P ASME TURB EXP GT20
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Comprehensive Survey on Distance/Similarity Measures between Probability Density Functions
[4]   Uncertainty Quantification in Aeroelasticity [J].
Beran, Philip ;
Stanford, Bret ;
Schrock, Christopher .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF FLUID MECHANICS, VOL 49, 2017, 49 :361-386
[5]  
Cavazzuti M., 2013, OPTIMIZATION METHODS, P13, DOI DOI 10.1021/ACS.JAFC.2C01088
[6]   Uncertainty Quantification in Multiscale Simulation of Materials: A Prospective [J].
Chernatynskiy, Aleksandr ;
Phillpot, Simon R. ;
LeSar, Richard .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF MATERIALS RESEARCH, VOL 43, 2013, 43 :157-182
[7]   Efficient space-filling and non-collapsing sequential design strategies for simulation-based modeling [J].
Crombecq, K. ;
Laermans, E. ;
Dhaene, T. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2011, 214 (03) :683-696
[8]   Numerical studies of space-filling designs: optimization of Latin Hypercube Samples and subprojection properties [J].
Damblin, G. ;
Couplet, M. ;
Iooss, B. .
JOURNAL OF SIMULATION, 2013, 7 (04) :276-289
[9]   A scalable geometric multigrid solver for nonsymmetric elliptic systems with application to variable-density flows [J].
Esmaily, M. ;
Jofre, L. ;
Mani, A. ;
Iaccarino, G. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2018, 357 :142-158
[10]  
Fang KT, 2006, CH CRC COMP SCI DATA, P3