Enhanced sampling schemes for MCMC based blind Bernoulli-Gaussian deconvolution

被引:31
作者
Ge, D. [1 ]
Idier, J. [2 ]
Le Carpentier, E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Glaizer Grp, F-92240 Malakoff, France
[2] IRCCyN CNRS UMR 6597, F-44321 Nantes 3, France
关键词
Blind deconvolution; Bernoulli-Gaussian model; Markov chain Monte Carlo methods;
D O I
10.1016/j.sigpro.2010.08.009
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
This paper proposes and compares two new sampling schemes for sparse deconvolution using a Bernoulli-Gaussian model. To tackle such a deconvolution problem in a blind and unsupervised context, the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) framework is usually adopted, and the chosen sampling scheme is most often the Gibbs sampler. However, such a sampling scheme fails to explore the state space efficiently. Our first alternative, the K-tuple Gibbs sampler, is simply a grouped Gibbs sampler. The second one, called partially marginalized sampler, is obtained by integrating the Gaussian amplitudes out of the target distribution. While the mathematical validity of the first scheme is obvious as a particular instance of the Gibbs sampler, a more detailed analysis is provided to prove the validity of the second scheme. For both methods, optimized implementations are proposed in terms of computation and storage cost. Finally, simulation results validate both schemes as more efficient in terms of convergence time compared with the plain Gibbs sampler. Benchmark sequence simulations show that the partially marginalized sampler takes fewer iterations to converge than the K-tuple Gibbs sampler. However, its computation load per iteration grows almost quadratically with respect to the data length, while it only grows linearly for the K-tuple Gibbs sampler. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:759 / 772
页数:14
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2008, Technical report
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2010, BERNOULLI GAUSSIAN D
  • [3] Bourguignon S., 2005, P IEEE WORKSH STAT S, P811
  • [4] General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations
    Brooks, SP
    Gelman, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND GRAPHICAL STATISTICS, 1998, 7 (04) : 434 - 455
  • [5] Simulation-based methods for blind maximum-likelihood filter identification
    Cappé, O
    Doucet, A
    Lavielle, M
    Moulines, E
    [J]. SIGNAL PROCESSING, 1999, 73 (1-2) : 3 - 25
  • [6] Unsupervised deconvolution of sparse spike trains using stochastic approximation
    Champagnat, F
    Goussard, Y
    Idier, J
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 1996, 44 (12) : 2988 - 2998
  • [7] Simultaneous wavelet estimation and deconvolution of reflection seismic signals
    Cheng, QS
    Chen, R
    Li, TH
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1996, 34 (02): : 377 - 384
  • [8] Chi C. Y., 1984, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, VIT-30, P429
  • [9] Joint segmentation of multivariate astronomical time series: Bayesian sampling with a hierarchical model
    Dobigeon, Nicolas
    Tourneret, Jean-Yves
    Scargle, Jeffrey D.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2007, 55 (02) : 414 - 423
  • [10] GE D, 2008, EUSIPCO LAUS SWITZ S