Accuracy of anterior nasal swab rapid antigen tests compared with RT-PCR for massive SARS-CoV-2 screening in low prevalence population

被引:9
作者
Jakobsen, Kathrine Kronberg [1 ]
Jensen, Jakob Schmidt [1 ]
Todsen, Tobias [1 ,2 ]
Kirkby, Nikolai [3 ]
Lippert, Freddy [4 ]
Vangsted, Anne-Marie [5 ]
Klokker, Mads [1 ]
von Buchwald, Christian [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Rigshosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg & Audiol, Inge Lehmanns Vej 8, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Copenhagen Acad Med Educ & Simulat, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Rigshosp, Dept Clin Microbiol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Copenhagen Emergency Med Serv, Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Testctr Danmark, Statens Serum Inst, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; diagnostic testing; rapid antigen test;
D O I
10.1111/apm.13189
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
The aim was to determine the accuracy of anterior nasal swab in rapid antigen (Ag) tests in a low SARS-CoV-2 prevalence and massive screened community. Individuals, aged 18 years or older, who self-booked an appointment for real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test in March 2021 at a public test center in Copenhagen, Denmark were included. An oropharyngeal swab was collected for RT-PCR testing, followed by a swab from the anterior parts of the nose examined by Ag test (SD Biosensor). Accuracy of the Ag test was calculated with RT-PCR as reference. We included 7074 paired conclusive tests (n = 3461, female: 50.7%). The median age was 48 years (IQR: 36-57 years). The prevalence was 0.9%, that is, 66 tests were positive on RT-PCR. Thirty-two had a paired positive Ag test. The sensitivity was 48.5% and the specificity was 100%. This study conducted in a low prevalence setting in a massive screening set-up showed that the Ag test had a sensitivity of 48.5% and a specificity of 100%, that is, no false positive tests. The lower sensitivity is a challenge especially if Ag testing is not repeated frequently allowing this scalable test to be a robust supplement to RT-PCR testing in an ambitious public SARS-CoV-2 screening.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 100
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Accuracy of COVID-19 rapid antigenic tests compared to RT-PCR in a student population: The StudyCov study
    Ferte, Thomas
    Ramel, Viviane
    Cazanave, Charles
    Lafon, Marie-Edith
    Bebear, Cecile
    Malvy, Denis
    Georges-Walryck, Agnes
    Dehail, Patrick
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2021, 141
  • [32] Diagnostic Performance Assessment of Saliva RT-PCR and Nasopharyngeal Antigen for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Peru
    Calderon, Roger I.
    Jhaveri, Tulip A.
    Tovar, Marco A.
    Palomino, J. Santiago
    Barreda, Nadia N.
    Sanabria, Oswaldo M.
    Peinado, Jesus
    Ramirez, Claudio
    Llanos Zavalaga, L. Fernando
    Valderrama, Gissela
    Franke, Molly F.
    Mitnick, Carole D.
    Lecca, Leonid
    Velasquez, Gustavo E.
    MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2022, 10 (04):
  • [33] The Performance of Two Rapid Antigen Tests During Population-Level Screening for SARS-CoV-2 Infection
    Alghounaim, Mohammad
    Bastaki, Hamad
    Bin Essa, Farah
    Motlagh, Hoda
    Al-Sabah, Salman
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2021, 8
  • [34] Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in PregnantWomen Assessed by RT-PCR in Franconia, Germany: First Results of the SCENARIO Study (SARS-CoV-2 prEvalence in pregNAncy and at biRth In FrancOnia)
    Hein, Alexander
    Kehl, Sven
    Haeberle, Lothar
    Tiemann, Carsten
    Peuker, Rebecca
    Mereutanu, Denise
    Stumpfe, Florian M.
    Faschingbauer, Florian
    Meyer-Schlinkmann, Kirstin
    Koch, Martin C.
    Kainer, Franz
    Dammer, Ulf
    Philipp, Hanna
    Kladt, Carolin
    Schrauder, Michael G.
    Weingaertler, Stefan
    Hanf, Volker
    Hartmann, Arndt
    Ruebner, Matthias
    Schneider, Holm
    Lelieveld, Jos
    Beckmann, Matthias W.
    Wurmthaler, Lena A.
    Fasching, Peter A.
    Schneider, Michael O.
    GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2022, 82 (02) : 226 - 234
  • [35] Development of a rapid viability RT-PCR (RV-RT-PCR) method to detect infectious SARS-CoV-2 from swabs
    Shah, Sanjiv R.
    Kane, Staci R.
    Elsheikh, Maher
    Alfaro, Teneile M.
    JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2021, 297
  • [36] Utilization of rapid antigen tests for screening SARS-CoV-2 prior to dental treatment
    Pittayapat, Pisha
    Trachoo, Vorapat
    Jirachoksopon, Chongpean
    Udom, Kalaya
    Champakerdsap, Chunya
    Rungrojwittayakul, Oraphan
    Kamolratanakul, Paksinee
    Linsuwanont, Pairoj
    Boonprakong, Lawan
    Koottathape, Natthavoot
    Pungpapong, Vitara
    Osathanon, Thanaphum
    Jansisyanont, Pornchai
    FRONTIERS IN ORAL HEALTH, 2022, 3
  • [37] Diagnostic Accuracy of Conjunctival Rt-Pcr in Sars-Cov-2: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Accuracy Meta-Analysis
    Faubert, A.
    Bohsina, R.
    You, E.
    Hebert, M.
    Griffith, M.
    Aubin, M. J.
    OCULAR IMMUNOLOGY AND INFLAMMATION, 2024, 32 (08) : 1621 - 1632
  • [38] Effectiveness of Sample Pooling Strategies for SARS-CoV-2 Mass Screening by RT-PCR: A Scoping Review
    Deka, Sangeeta
    Kalita, Deepjyoti
    JOURNAL OF LABORATORY PHYSICIANS, 2020, 12 (03) : 212 - 218
  • [39] Evaluation of a New Standardized Nasal Sampling Method for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA via RT-PCR
    Koeleman, Johannes G. M.
    Mol, Sander
    Brand, Henk
    Ong, David S. Y.
    MICROORGANISMS, 2024, 12 (01)
  • [40] Clinical Evaluation of Nasopharyngeal, Oropharyngeal, Nasal Swabs, and Saliva for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 by Direct RT-PCR
    Kiryanov, Sergei A.
    Levina, Tatiana A.
    Kadochnikova, Vladislava V.
    Konopleva, Maria V.
    Suslov, Anatoly P.
    Trofimov, Dmitry Yu.
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (05)