Accuracy of anterior nasal swab rapid antigen tests compared with RT-PCR for massive SARS-CoV-2 screening in low prevalence population

被引:9
|
作者
Jakobsen, Kathrine Kronberg [1 ]
Jensen, Jakob Schmidt [1 ]
Todsen, Tobias [1 ,2 ]
Kirkby, Nikolai [3 ]
Lippert, Freddy [4 ]
Vangsted, Anne-Marie [5 ]
Klokker, Mads [1 ]
von Buchwald, Christian [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Rigshosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg & Audiol, Inge Lehmanns Vej 8, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Copenhagen Acad Med Educ & Simulat, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Rigshosp, Dept Clin Microbiol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Copenhagen Emergency Med Serv, Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Testctr Danmark, Statens Serum Inst, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; diagnostic testing; rapid antigen test;
D O I
10.1111/apm.13189
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
The aim was to determine the accuracy of anterior nasal swab in rapid antigen (Ag) tests in a low SARS-CoV-2 prevalence and massive screened community. Individuals, aged 18 years or older, who self-booked an appointment for real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test in March 2021 at a public test center in Copenhagen, Denmark were included. An oropharyngeal swab was collected for RT-PCR testing, followed by a swab from the anterior parts of the nose examined by Ag test (SD Biosensor). Accuracy of the Ag test was calculated with RT-PCR as reference. We included 7074 paired conclusive tests (n = 3461, female: 50.7%). The median age was 48 years (IQR: 36-57 years). The prevalence was 0.9%, that is, 66 tests were positive on RT-PCR. Thirty-two had a paired positive Ag test. The sensitivity was 48.5% and the specificity was 100%. This study conducted in a low prevalence setting in a massive screening set-up showed that the Ag test had a sensitivity of 48.5% and a specificity of 100%, that is, no false positive tests. The lower sensitivity is a challenge especially if Ag testing is not repeated frequently allowing this scalable test to be a robust supplement to RT-PCR testing in an ambitious public SARS-CoV-2 screening.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 100
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reliability of RT-PCR tests to detect SARS-CoV-2: Risk analysis
    Bezier C.
    Anthoine G.
    Charki A.
    Charki, Abdérafi (abderafi.charki@univ-angers.fr), 1600, EDP Sciences (11):
  • [22] Diagnostic accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test from self-collected anterior nasal swabs in children compared to rapid antigen test and RT-PCR from nasopharyngeal swabs collected by healthcare workers: A multicentric prospective study
    Cohen, Robert
    Aupiais, Camille
    Filleron, Anne
    Cahn-Sellem, Fabienne
    Romain, Olivier
    Bechet, Stephane
    Auvrignon, Anne
    Batard, Christophe
    Virey, Brigitte
    Jung, Camille
    Rybak, Alexis
    Levy, Corinne
    FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2022, 10
  • [23] A Nasal Complication of Nasopharyngeal Swab for Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) Detection of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA
    Rigante, Mario
    Picciotti, Pasqualina M.
    Parrilla, Claudio
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (07)
  • [24] Rapid processing of SARS-CoV-2 containing specimens for direct RT-PCR
    Chomczynski, Piotr
    Chomczynski, Peter W.
    Kennedy, Amy
    Rymaszewski, Michal
    Wilfinger, William W.
    Heiny, Judith A.
    Mackey, Karol
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (02):
  • [25] Diagnostic accuracy of a rapid antigen triple test (SARS-CoV-2, respiratory syncytial virus, and influenza) using anterior nasal swabs versus multiplex RT-PCR in children in an emergency department
    Ferrani, Salim
    Prazuck, Thierry
    Bechet, Stephane
    Lesne, Fabien
    Cohen, Robert
    Levy, Corinne
    INFECTIOUS DISEASES NOW, 2023, 53 (07):
  • [26] Negative preoperative RT-PCR screening is no guaranty of no SARS-CoV-2 infection
    Lippi, G.
    Sanchis-Gomar, F.
    Henry, B. M.
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA Y REANIMACION, 2023, 70 (02): : 119 - 120
  • [27] Negative preoperative RT-PCR screening is no guaranty of no SARS-CoV-2 infection
    de la Matta, M.
    Delgado-Sanchez, J. M.
    Martin-Gutierrez, G.
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA Y REANIMACION, 2024, 71 (05):
  • [28] Comparison between Nasal and Nasopharyngeal Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Detection in an Asymptomatic Population, and Direct Confirmation by RT-PCR from the Residual Buffer
    Patriquin, Glenn
    LeBlanc, Jason J.
    Williams, Catherine
    Hatchette, Todd F.
    Ross, John
    Barrett, Lisa
    Davidson, Ross
    MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2022, 10 (01):
  • [29] Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Nasal Cavity and Nasopharyngeal Swab Samples for SARS-CoV-2 Detection with Rapid Antigen Test
    Kim, Y.
    Kim, S.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 24 (10): : S56 - S56
  • [30] Y The performance of the SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test as a tool for detecting SARS-CoV-2 infection in the population
    Stang, Andreas
    Robers, Johannes
    Schonert, Birte
    Joeckel, Karl-Heinz
    Spelsberg, Angela
    Keil, Ulrich
    Cullen, Paul
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION, 2021, 83 (02) : 244 - 245