Comparison of the retention strengths of three complete denture adhesives: An in vivo study

被引:19
作者
Manes, Jose F. [2 ]
Selva, Eduardo J. [1 ]
De-Barutell, Alfonso [1 ]
Bouazza, Kheira [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valencia, Dept Stomatol, Valencia 46010, Spain
[2] European Univ Madrid, Ctr Assigned Valencia, Valencia, Spain
[3] CEU Cardenal Herrera Univ, Dept Dent, Valencia, Spain
来源
MEDICINA ORAL PATOLOGIA ORAL Y CIRUGIA BUCAL | 2011年 / 16卷 / 01期
关键词
Retention; complete dentures; adhesives of dentures; MICROBIAL-CONTAMINATION;
D O I
10.4317/medoral.16.e132
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Statement of problem: One of the main problems posed by complete dentures is retention and stability. In order to solve this problem, dentists and the dental industry for a long time have attempted to improve denture adhesion by developing a range of "glues" of highly varied composition and efficacy. Purpouse: The present in vivo clinical study evaluates whether the adhesives used to improve complete denture retention are truly effective and able to increase denture adhesion to the mucosa covering the edentulous alveolar ridge of the mandibular dentures. Material and Methods: An in vivo clinical study is made of 30 patients with complete mandibular dentures to evaluate the retention afforded by three commercial complete denture adhesives (Benfix (R), Fittydent (R) and Supercorega (R)). A spring scale was used to measure retention strength (in grams). The purpose was to determine whether the use of complete denture adhesives is effective, and to establish which commercial brands offer the highest retention strengths. Results and Conclusion: The results obtained indicate that retention is enhanced by the use of such adhesives, and that Fittydent (R) offers the best retention performance, followed by Benfix (R) and Supercorega (R). Clinical implications: the study of denture adhesives and his efficiency are necessary to improve the edentulous patient satisfaction. More in vivo investigations are necessary in dental literature.
引用
收藏
页码:E132 / E136
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Berg E, 1991, Int J Prosthodont, V4, P449
[2]   RETENTION OF DENTURE ADHESIVES - AN INVITRO STUDY [J].
CHEW, CL .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 1990, 17 (05) :425-434
[3]   DENTURE ADHESIVES - THEIR EFFECTS ON DENTURE RETENTION AND STABILITY [J].
CHEW, CL ;
BOONE, ME ;
SWARTZ, ML ;
PHILLIPS, RW .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1985, 13 (02) :152-159
[4]  
Coates A J, 1995, Aust Prosthodont J, V9, P27
[5]   DENTURE ADHESIVES - CYTOTOXICITY, MICROBIAL-CONTAMINATION, AND FORMALDEHYDE CONTENT [J].
EKSTRAND, K ;
HENSTENPETTERSEN, A .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1993, 69 (03) :314-317
[6]   MICROBIAL-CONTAMINATION IN 4 COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE DENTURE ADHESIVES [J].
GATES, WD ;
GOLDSCHMIDT, M ;
KRAMER, D .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1994, 71 (02) :154-158
[7]   Denture adhesives: Changing attitudes [J].
Grasso, JE .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 127 (01) :90-96
[8]   A CLINICAL EVALUATION OF DENTURE ADHESIVES [J].
KAPUR, KK .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1967, 18 (06) :550-&
[9]   Examining patients' responses about the effectiveness of five denture adhesive pastes [J].
Kelsey, CC ;
Lang, BR ;
Wang, RF .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 128 (11) :1532-1538
[10]   Method for enhancing retention in complete denture bases [J].
Kikuchi, M ;
Ghani, F ;
Watanabe, M .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1999, 81 (04) :399-403