Dysfunctional institutions? Toward a New Agenda in Governance Studies

被引:21
作者
Prakash, Aseem [1 ]
Potoski, Matthew [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
关键词
governance; institutions; policy failure; GLOBAL PRIVATE REGIMES; REGULATORY CAPTURE; SELECTION BIAS; ORGANIZATIONS; INDEPENDENCE; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1111/rego.12113
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
There is a wide-spread perception among academics and commentators that institutional dysfunction has become increasingly common in important social, political, and economics arenas. Opinion polls show a decline in trust and confidence in major actors and institutions, including inter-governmental organizations, governments, firms, NGOs, and religious organizations. For some, the core of the problem is that the hitherto well-functioning states have become less effective in aggregating and acting upon citizens' preferences. Many policy initiatives of the 1990s - deregulation, privatization, new public management, private regulation, regional integration, civil society, and so on - seemed to have failed to meet expectations. This symposium seeks to identify important theoretical and empirical questions about institutional failure, such as why do institutions fail, why are they not self-correcting, what might be a clear evaluative yardstick and analytic approach by which to measure performance, and to what extent contemporary theories of institutional evolution and design are useful in examining institutional restructuring and institutional renewal? Symposium essays by leading social science scholars offer important insights to inform future work on institutional performance and outline an agenda for institutional renewal and change.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 125
页数:11
相关论文
共 36 条
[31]  
Ostrom, 1990, Governing the Commons, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511807763
[32]  
Polanyi Karl., 2001, The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time, V2nd
[33]  
Prakash A, 2006, VOLUNTARY ENVIRONMENTALISTS: GREEN CLUBS, ISO 14001, AND VOLUNTARY REGULATIONS, P1, DOI 10.2277/ 0521677726
[34]   Global Private Regimes, Domestic Public Law: ISO 14001 and Pollution Reduction [J].
Prakash, Aseem ;
Potoski, Matthew .
COMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES, 2014, 47 (03) :369-394
[35]   Agents as Brokers: Leadership in Multilateral Organizations [J].
Saz-Carranza, Angel .
GLOBAL POLICY, 2015, 6 (03) :277-289
[36]   Do treaties constrain or screen? Selection bias and treaty compliance [J].
Von Stein, J .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2005, 99 (04) :611-622