Upper canine inclination influences the aesthetics of a smile

被引:13
作者
Bothung, C. [1 ]
Fischer, K. [2 ]
Schiffer, H.
Springer, I. [3 ]
Wolfart, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Fac Med, Ctr Implantol, Dept Prosthodont & Biomat, Aachen, Germany
[2] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Fac Med, Dept Med Stat, Aachen, Germany
[3] IAesthetic, Inst Aesthet Med, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
full-face; aesthetics; posed smile; smile aesthetics; smile analysis; upper canine inclination; DENTAL APPEARANCE; LAYPERSONS PERSPECTIVE; INCISOR ANGULATION; FACIAL AESTHETICS; POSED SMILE; ATTRACTIVENESS; PREFERENCES; SCALE; SHAPE;
D O I
10.1111/joor.12234
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
This current study investigated which angle of canine inclination (angle between canine tooth axis (CA-line) and the line between the lateral canthus and the ipsilateral labial angle (EM-line)) is perceived to be most attractive in a smile. The second objective was to determine whether laymen and dental experts share the same opinion. A Q-sort assessment was performed with 48 posed smile photographs to obtain two models of neutral facial attractiveness. Two sets of images (1 male model set, 1 female model set), each containing seven images with incrementally altered canine and posterior teeth inclinations, were generated. The images were ranked for attractiveness by three groups (61 laymen, 59 orthodontists, 60 dentists). The images with 0 degrees inclination, that is CA-line (maxillary canine axis) parallel to EM-line (the line formed by the lateral canthus and the ipsilateral corner of the mouth) (male model set: 544%; female model set: 389%), or -5 degrees (inward) inclination (male model set: 20%; female model set: 294%) were perceived to be most attractive within each set. Images showing inward canine inclinations were regarded to be more attractive than those with outward inclinations. Dental experts and laymen were in accordance with the aesthetics. Smiles were perceived to be most attractive when the upper canine tooth axis was parallel to the EM-line. In reconstructive or orthodontic therapy, it is thus important to incline canines more inwardly than outwardly.
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 152
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
[21]   Perceptions of dental professionals and laypersons to altered dental esthetics: Asymmetric and symmetric situations [J].
Kokich, Vincent O. ;
Kokich, Vincent G. ;
Kiyak, H. Asuman .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2006, 130 (02) :141-151
[22]   Esthetics and smile characteristics evaluated by laypersons A comparison of Canadian and US data [J].
McLeod, Catherine ;
Fields, H. W. ;
Hechter, Frank ;
Wiltshire, William ;
Rody, Wellington, Jr. ;
Christensen, James .
ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2011, 81 (02) :198-205
[23]   Buccal corridors and smile esthetics [J].
Moore, T ;
Southard, KA ;
Casko, JS ;
Qian, F ;
Southard, TE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2005, 127 (02) :208-213
[24]   Q-sort assessment vs visual analog scale in the evaluation of smile esthetics [J].
Schabel, Brian J. ;
McNamara, James A., Jr. ;
Franchi, Lorenzo ;
Baccetti, Tiziano .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2009, 135 (04) :S61-S71
[25]   RANK TEST FOR 2 GROUP CONCORDANCE [J].
SCHUCANY, WR ;
FRAWLEY, WH .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1973, 38 (02) :249-258
[26]   THE INFLUENCE OF DENTOFACIAL APPEARANCE ON THE SOCIAL ATTRACTIVENESS OF YOUNG-ADULTS [J].
SHAW, WC ;
REES, G ;
DAWE, M ;
CHARLES, CR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1985, 87 (01) :21-26
[27]   Smile esthetics from the layperson's perspective [J].
Springer, Nathan C. ;
Chang, Chan ;
Fields, Henry W. ;
Beck, F. Michael ;
Firestone, Allen R. ;
Rosenstiel, Stephen ;
Christensen, James C. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2011, 139 (01) :e91-e101
[28]  
Stephenson W., 1953, The study of behavior
[29]  
Q-technique and its methodology
[30]   A DENTAL-FACIAL ATTRACTIVENESS SCALE .1. RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY [J].
TEDESCO, LA ;
ALBINO, JE ;
CUNAT, JJ ;
GREEN, LJ ;
LEWIS, EA ;
SLAKTER, MJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1983, 83 (01) :38-43