Contrast in Edge Vegetation Structure Modifies the Predation Risk of Natural Ground Nests in an Agricultural Landscape

被引:22
作者
Schneider, Nicole A. [1 ]
Low, Matthew [1 ]
Arlt, Debora [1 ,2 ]
Part, Tomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Ecol, Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Univ Reading, Ctr Agri Environm Res, Sch Agr Policy & Dev, Reading, Berks, England
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; MUSTELA-NIVALIS; FOREST; FARMLAND; BIRDS; RESPONSES; PERMEABILITY; MECHANISMS; INCREASES; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0031517
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Nest predation risk generally increases nearer forest-field edges in agricultural landscapes. However, few studies test whether differences in edge contrast (i.e. hard versus soft edges based on vegetation structure and height) affect edge-related predation patterns and if such patterns are related to changes in nest conspicuousness between incubation and nestling feeding. Using data on 923 nesting attempts we analyse factors influencing nest predation risk at different edge types in an agricultural landscape of a ground-cavity breeding bird species, the Northern Wheatear (Oenanthe oenanthe). As for many other bird species, nest predation is a major determinant of reproductive success in this migratory passerine. Nest predation risk was higher closer to woodland and crop field edges, but only when these were hard edges in terms of ground vegetation structure (clear contrast between tall vs short ground vegetation). No such edge effect was observed at soft edges where adjacent habitats had tall ground vegetation (crop, ungrazed grassland). This edge effect on nest predation risk was evident during the incubation stage but not the nestling feeding stage. Since wheatear nests are depredated by ground-living animals our results demonstrate: (i) that edge effects depend on edge contrast, (ii) that edge-related nest predation patterns vary across the breeding period probably resulting from changes in parental activity at the nest between the incubation and nestling feeding stage. Edge effects should be put in the context of the nest predator community as illustrated by the elevated nest predation risk at hard but not soft habitat edges when an edge is defined in terms of ground vegetation. These results thus can potentially explain previously observed variations in edge-related nest predation risk.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   ELEVATED PREDATION RATES AS AN EDGE EFFECT IN HABITAT ISLANDS - EXPERIMENTAL-EVIDENCE [J].
ANDREN, H ;
ANGELSTAM, P .
ECOLOGY, 1988, 69 (02) :544-547
[2]   PREDATION ON GROUND-NESTING BIRDS NESTS IN RELATION TO PREDATOR DENSITIES AND HABITAT EDGE [J].
ANGELSTAM, P .
OIKOS, 1986, 47 (03) :365-373
[3]   Nonideal breeding habitat selection:: A mismatch between preference and fitness [J].
Arlt, Debora ;
Pärt, Tomas .
ECOLOGY, 2007, 88 (03) :792-801
[4]   Habitat-Specific Population Growth of a Farmland Bird [J].
Arlt, Debora ;
Forslund, Par ;
Jeppsson, Tobias ;
Part, Tomas .
PLOS ONE, 2008, 3 (08)
[5]   Evidence of an edge effect on avian nest success [J].
Batáry, P ;
Báldi, A .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2004, 18 (02) :389-400
[6]   Movement patterns of a specialist predator, the weasel Mustela nivalis exploiting asynchronous cyclic field vole Microtus agrestis populations [J].
Brandt, Miriam J. ;
Lambin, Xavier .
ACTA THERIOLOGICA, 2007, 52 (01) :13-25
[7]  
Cain JW, 2006, J WILDLIFE MANAGE, V70, P522, DOI 10.2193/0022-541X(2006)70[522:IOMAON]2.0.CO
[8]  
2
[9]   Nest predators and fragmentation: a review and meta-analysis [J].
Chalfoun, AD ;
Thompson, FR ;
Ratnaswamy, MJ .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2002, 16 (02) :306-318
[10]  
Cooch E., 2008, PROGRAM MARK GENTLE