Beliefs and attitudes of nurses and physicians about do not resuscitate orders and who should speak to patients and families about them

被引:37
作者
Sulmasy, Daniel P. [1 ,2 ]
He, M. Kai [1 ]
McAuley, Ruth [3 ]
Ury, Wayne A. [4 ]
机构
[1] St Vincents Hosp Manhattan, John Conley Dept Eth, New York, NY USA
[2] New York Med Coll, Bioeth Inst, Valhalla, NY 10595 USA
[3] St Vincents Hosp Staten Island, New York, NY USA
[4] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Pain Med & Palliat Care, New York, NY 10003 USA
关键词
do not resuscitate; nurses; house officers; confidence; communication; ethics;
D O I
10.1097/CCM.0b013e31817c79fe
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: Both physicians and nurses play important roles in discussing do not resuscitate (DNR) orders with patients and surrogates. However, the beliefs and attitudes of health professionals about the role nurses should play in this process have received little systematic study. Design and Settingp: An anonymous survey was conducted of 217 attending internists, 132 medical house officers, and 219 staff nurses working on the medical floors and units at two teaching hospitals about their beliefs, attitudes, and confidence regarding DNR discussions. Results: Attendings and house officers were more likely than nurses to believe that nurses should never initiate DNR discussions (p <.001). Nonetheless, 69% of both physician groups agreed that nurses should be allowed to do so. Nurses were the most likely of the three groups to consider DNR discussions rewarding clinical experiences (p <.001). In a multivariate ordinal regression model controlling for sex, attitudes about DNR discussions, and confidence in discussing consent for medical procedures, nurses were less confident than attendings (p =.04) but more confident than house officers in their ability to discuss DNR orders (p =.02). Conclusions: Staff nurses were more likely than their physician colleagues to believe they should be allowed to initiate DNR discussions, were more confident in their ability to discuss DNR than house officers, and had more positive attitudes. These results suggest further exploration of the role nurses should play in the DNR process.
引用
收藏
页码:1817 / 1822
页数:6
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] *AM NURS ASS CTR E, 2003, POS STAT NURS CAR DO
  • [2] SELF-EFFICACY - TOWARD A UNIFYING THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL CHANGE
    BANDURA, A
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (02) : 191 - 215
  • [3] Bandura A., 1997, Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
  • [4] Nurse involvement in end-of-life decision making: the ETHICUS Study
    Benbenishty, J
    Ganz, FD
    Lippert, A
    Bulow, HH
    Wennberg, E
    Henderson, B
    Svantesson, M
    Baras, M
    Phelan, D
    Maia, P
    Sprung, CL
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2006, 32 (01) : 129 - 132
  • [5] Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care
    Bodenheimer, T
    Lorig, K
    Holman, H
    Grumbach, K
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 288 (19): : 2469 - 2475
  • [6] Teaching patient-centered tobacco intervention to first-year medical students
    Brown, RL
    Pfeifer, JM
    Gjerde, CL
    Seibert, CS
    Haq, CL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 19 (05) : 534 - 539
  • [7] Calam B, 2000, CAN MED ASSOC J, V163, P1255
  • [8] Life-sustaining treatment decisions in Portuguese intensive care units: a national survey of intensive care physicians
    Cardoso, T
    Fonseca, T
    Pereira, S
    Lencastre, L
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2003, 7 (06): : R167 - R175
  • [9] Pretesting survey instruments: An overview of cognitive methods
    Collins, D
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2003, 12 (03) : 229 - 238
  • [10] DETERMINANTS IN CANADIAN HEALTH-CARE WORKERS OF THE DECISION TO WITHDRAW LIFE-SUPPORT FROM THE CRITICALLY ILL
    COOK, DJ
    GUYATT, GH
    JAESCHKE, R
    REEVE, J
    SPANIER, A
    KING, D
    MOLLOY, DW
    WILLAN, A
    STREINER, DL
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 273 (09): : 703 - 708