Effectiveness through risk reduction: a comparison of the renewable obligation in England and Wales and the feed-in system in Germany

被引:317
作者
Mitchell, C [1 ]
Bauknecht, D
Connor, PM
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Warwick Business Sch, Ctr Mangement Regulat, Coventry, W Midlands, England
[2] Oko Inst eV, Freiberg, Germany
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
renewables; delivery; risk;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The European Union is particularly rich in variations of different delivery mechanisms for increasing the use of renewable energy. The requirements of liberalisation in continental Europe, the re-regulation of the UK's gas and electricity sectors in 2000 and ongoing environmental commitments has meant the establishment of a new generation of mechanisms following on from early prototypes. This paper analyses two new mechanisms in detail: the England and Wales RO (Renewables Obligation) and the German EEG (Erneuerbare Energien Gesetz), with a particular focus on how they reduce risk for generators. Assuming that risk reduction is an important way to make a support mechanism effective in promoting deployment, the analysis will look at three different kinds of risk, namely, price, volume and balancing risk. It is argued that the German EEG is more effective at increasing the share of renewables than the England and Wales RO because it reduces risk for RES generators more effectively. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 305
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] BATHURST G, 2001, VALUE INTERMITTENT R
  • [2] BAUKNECHT D, 2002, ENERGIEWIRTSHAFTLICH, V52, P446
  • [3] BAUKNECHT D, 2003, CASE STUDY GERMANY
  • [4] *BMWI, 2002, BER STAND MARK KOST
  • [5] *DTI, 2003, WHIT PAP EN OUR CHAN
  • [6] *DTI, 2001, 45 DTI
  • [7] *IL, 2002, COST REFL IMB CHARG
  • [8] *IL, 2002, NET IS ON YEAR OLD B
  • [9] *IL, 2002, NETA NEXT PHAS 18 NO
  • [10] The diffusion of renewable energy technology: an analytical framework and key issues for research
    Jacobsson, S
    Johnson, A
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2000, 28 (09) : 625 - 640