Evaluation and management of prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer

被引:25
作者
Naito, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyushu Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Urol, Higashi Ku, Fukuoka 8128582, Japan
关键词
prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy; prostate-specific antigen; recurrence; salvage radiotherapy; hormonal therapy;
D O I
10.1093/jjco/hyi113
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
A radical prostatectomy has been established as one of the standard management options for localized prostate cancer. However, a substantial proportion of patients who undergo a radical prostatectomy develop prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence which is commonly defined as a PSA cut-off point value of 0.2 ng/ml. Although the management of PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy may depend on the site of recurrence, it is quite difficult to identify the recurrent lesion accurately based on the currently available imaging technology. Patients who have surgical margin involvement or a Gleason score <= 7 based on the radical prostatectomy specimens, who do not have nodal or seminal vesicle involvement, and who develop a PSA recurrence > 1-2 years after surgery with a doubling time of > 1 year, and whose pre-treatment PSA is < 1.0-1.5 ng/ml are considered to benefit from local treatment with at least 64 Gy of salvage radiotherapy. Patients with different characteristics are considered to have distant metastases or both local lesions and distant metastases, and thus may be candidates for hormonal manipulation rather than radiotherapy. Since local recurrent lesions are considered to be quite small at the early stage of PSA recurrence, hormonal manipulation may be sufficient to prevent disease progression instead of radiotherapy. However, the optimal type and timing of hormonal manipulation remain to be elucidated. As a result, no consensus regarding the treatment for PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy has yet been reached.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 374
页数:10
相关论文
共 97 条
[1]   Defining prostate specific antigen progression after radical prostatectomy: What is the most appropriate cut point? [J].
Amling, CL ;
Bergstralh, EJ ;
Blute, ML ;
Slezak, JM ;
Zincke, H .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 165 (04) :1146-1151
[2]   TREATMENT WITH FINASTERIDE FOLLOWING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
ANDRIOLE, G ;
LIEBER, M ;
SMITH, J ;
SOLOWAY, M ;
SCHROEDER, F ;
KADMON, D ;
DEKERNION, J ;
RAJFER, J ;
BOAKE, R ;
CRAWFORD, D ;
RAMSEY, E ;
PERREAULT, J ;
TRACHTENBERG, J ;
FRADET, T ;
BLOCK, N ;
MIDDLETON, R ;
NG, J ;
FERGUSON, D ;
GORMLEY, G .
UROLOGY, 1995, 45 (03) :491-497
[3]   EAU guidelines on prostate cancer [J].
Aus, G ;
Abbou, CC ;
Pacik, D ;
Schmid, HP ;
van Poppel, H ;
Wolff, JM ;
Zattoni, F .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2001, 40 (02) :97-101
[4]  
Bauer JJ, 1997, CANCER, V79, P952, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19970301)79:5<952::AID-CNCR12>3.3.CO
[5]  
2-I
[6]   Management of prostate-specific antigen relapse in prostate cancer: A European consensus [J].
Boccon-Gibod, L ;
Djavan, B ;
Hammerer, P ;
Hoeltl, W ;
Kattan, MW ;
Prayer-Galetti, T ;
Teillac, P ;
Tunn, UW .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2004, 58 (04) :382-390
[7]   Improved survival in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy and goserelin [J].
Bolla, M ;
Gonzalez, D ;
Warde, P ;
Dubois, JB ;
Mirimanoff, RO ;
Storme, G ;
Bernier, J ;
Kuten, A ;
Sternberg, C ;
Gil, T ;
Collette, L ;
Pierart, M .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1997, 337 (05) :295-300
[8]  
Brooks JD, 1996, CANCER RES, V56, P3814
[9]   Long-term results of radiation therapy for prostate cancer recurrence following radical prostatectomy [J].
Lange, PH .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (01) :177-178
[10]   5-YEAR TUMOR RECURRENCE RATES AFTER ANATOMICAL RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY FOR PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
CATALONA, WJ ;
SMITH, DS .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 152 (05) :1837-1842