Evaluation of regional sustainability through emergy analysis: a case study of nine cities in the Yellow River Basin of China

被引:13
作者
Yuan, Xueliang [1 ]
Chen, Leping [1 ]
Sheng, Xuerou [1 ]
Li, Yue [1 ]
Liu, Mengyue [1 ]
Zhang, Yujie [1 ]
Jia, Yanshuang [1 ]
Qiu, Dongfang [2 ]
Wang, Qingsong [1 ]
Ma, Qiao [1 ]
Zuo, Jian [3 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Sch Energy & Power Engn, Res Ctr Sustainable Dev, Jinan 250061, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Liaocheng Ecol Environm Monitoring Ctr, Liaocheng 252000, Shandong, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Adelaide, Sch Architecture & Built Environm, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
关键词
Yellow River Basin; Emergy analysis; Emergy-based indicators; Sustainable development; URBAN METABOLISM; ENERGY; SYSTEMS; INDUSTRIAL; EFFICIENCY; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-022-18916-6
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Yellow River is an important ecological shelter zone and economic belt in China. However, rapid urbanization and industrialization has produced a fragile ecological environment conditions and unbalanced economic development in the Yellow River Basin (YRB). Ecological protection and high-quality development of the YRB has been China's national strategy since 2019. As the only coastal province with the largest economy and population in the YRB, the sustainable development of Shandong Province is of great importance in the region. This study evaluated the dynamic trend of sustainability levels of the nine cities in Shandong Province in the YRB through emergy analysis. Emergy-based indicators were established and analyzed from 2010 to 2019, taking account of the ecological service emergy (ESE) needed to dilute pollutants and emergy equivalent loss (EEL) on ecosystem quality and human health damage. Results showed that emergy sustainable indicators (ESI) in Tai'an, Heze, Dezhou, and Liaocheng ranged from 1 to 10, which had the potential for sustainable development. The ESI value of Jinan, Jining, Zibo, Dongying, and Binzhou was less than 1, which indicated that these cities were under great ecological pressure. The value of emergy indicators for sustainable development (EISD) of the nine cities all declined from 2010 to 2016, but remained stable from 2017 to 2019. Based on findings from the emergy analysis regarding policy implications and local conditions, the study concludes by providing proposals to improve regional sustainability.
引用
收藏
页码:40213 / 40225
页数:13
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Exploring the potentialities of emergy accounting in studying the limits to growth of urban systems
    Agostinho, Feni
    Sevegnani, Fabio
    Almeida, Cecilia M. V. B.
    Giannetti, Biagio F.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2018, 94 : 4 - 12
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2002, GB 3838-2002
  • [3] The geobiosphere emergy baseline: A synthesis
    Brown, Mark T.
    Campbell, Daniel E.
    De Vilbiss, Christopher
    Ulgiati, Sergio
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2016, 339 : 92 - 95
  • [4] Emergy evaluations and environmental loading of electricity production systems
    Brown, MT
    Ulgiati, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2002, 10 (04) : 321 - 334
  • [5] Emergy-based energy and material metabolism of the Yellow River basin
    Chen, B.
    Chen, G. Q.
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS IN NONLINEAR SCIENCE AND NUMERICAL SIMULATION, 2009, 14 (03) : 923 - 934
  • [6] Life cycle thinking-based eco-compensation for gold ingot production: a case study in China
    Chen, Wei
    Geng, Yong
    Wang, Chengxin
    Zhong, Shaozhuo
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (04) : 4463 - 4471
  • [7] [陈伟 Chen Wei], 2019, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V39, P7904
  • [8] Evaluation of ecological city and analysis of obstacle factors under the background of high-quality development: Taking cities in the Yellow River Basin as examples
    Chen, Yu
    Zhu, Mengke
    Lu, Junlin
    Zhou, Qian
    Ma, Wenbo
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2020, 118
  • [9] Cheng F. W., 2015, J BASIC SCI ENG, V23, P20, DOI DOI 10.16058/J.ISSN.1005-0930.2015.S1.003