The role of Chinese fiscal decentralization in the governance of carbon emissions: perspectives from spatial effects decomposition and its heterogeneity

被引:41
作者
Lv, Yulan [1 ]
Pang, Yumeng [2 ]
Dogan, Buhari [3 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Finance, Jinan 250014, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Publ Finance & Taxat, Nanjing 210046, Peoples R China
[3] Suleyman Demirel Univ, Dept Econ, Isparta, Turkey
关键词
E62; H23; ENVIRONMENTAL KUZNETS CURVE; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; PANEL-DATA ANALYSIS; CO2; EMISSIONS; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURE; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; TRADE; INTENSITY;
D O I
10.1007/s00168-021-01096-5
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Fiscal policy including fiscal revenue and expenditure is an important measure to deal with environment pollution and climate change by the Chinese government. This study investigates the impact of fiscal decentralization on carbon emissions and carbon intensity of 30 Chinese provinces over 1997 to 2017 using spatial econometric analysis, and the direct effect, indirect effect and total effect are derived. The empirical results indicate that fiscal decentralization has an inverted N-shaped relationship with carbon emissions and carbon intensity, and the impacts are mainly revealed through direct effects. Moreover, our analysis suggests that the influences of fiscal decentralization on carbon emissions and carbon intensity varies among different geographical regions, indicating that specific carbon emissions reduction policies should be formulated for different regions. This study links the carbon emissions with China's unique economic decentralization system, hereby providing practical support for the governance of carbon emissions in China.
引用
收藏
页码:635 / 668
页数:34
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]   Effects of public and private expenditures on environmental pollution: A dynamic heterogeneous panel data analysis [J].
Adewuyi, Adeolu O. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 65 :489-506
[2]   Public sector efficiency: An international comparison [J].
Afonso, A ;
Schuknecht, L ;
Tanzi, V .
PUBLIC CHOICE, 2005, 123 (3-4) :321-347
[3]  
Allison P, 2012, STAT HORIZONS 0910
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, INTERGOVERNMENTAL PA
[5]  
Anselin L., 2013, Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models, VVolume 4
[6]   Is free trade good for the environment? [J].
Antweiler, W ;
Copeland, BR ;
Taylor, MS .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (04) :877-908
[7]   A model for urban sector drivers of carbon emissions [J].
Azizalrahman, Hossny ;
Hasyimi, Valid .
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2019, 44 :46-55
[8]   A new look at the FDI-income-energy-environment nexus: Dynamic panel data analysis of ASEAN [J].
Baek, Jungho .
ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 91 :22-27
[9]   Fiscal Pressure, Tax Competition and Environmental Pollution [J].
Bai, Junhong ;
Lu, Jiayu ;
Li, Sijia .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2019, 73 (02) :431-447
[10]   Fiscal federalism and interjurisdictional externalities: New results and an application to US Air pollution [J].
Banzhaf, H. Spencer ;
Chupp, B. Andrew .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2012, 96 (5-6) :449-464