Overview, Comparative Assessment and Recommendations of Forecasting Models for Short-Term Water Demand Prediction

被引:43
作者
Anele, Amos O. [1 ]
Hamam, Yskandar [1 ]
Abu-Mahfouz, Adnan M. [1 ,2 ]
Todini, Ezio [3 ]
机构
[1] Tshwane Univ Technol, Dept Elect Engn, ZA-0001 Pretoria, South Africa
[2] CSIR, ZA-0081 Pretoria, South Africa
[3] Univ Bologna, Dept Biol Geol & Environm Sci, Via Zamboni 33, I-40126 Bologna, Italy
关键词
forecasting models; short-term; water demand simulation; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; CONDITIONAL PROCESSOR; CONSUMPTION; UNCERTAINTY; REGRESSION;
D O I
10.3390/w9110887
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The stochastic nature of water consumption patterns during the day and week varies. Therefore, to continually provide water to consumers with appropriate quality, quantity and pressure, water utilities require accurate and appropriate short-term water demand (STWD) forecasts. In view of this, an overview of forecasting methods for STWD prediction is presented. Based on that, a comparative assessment of the performance of alternative forecasting models from the different methods is studied. Times series models (i.e., autoregressive (AR), moving average (MA), autoregressive-moving average (ARMA), and ARMA with exogenous variable (ARMAX)) introduced by Box and Jenkins (1970), feed-forward back-propagation neural network (FFBP-NN), and hybrid model (i.e., combined forecasts from ARMA and FFBP-NN) are compared with each other for a common set of data. Akaike information criterion (AIC), originally proposed by Akaike (1974) is used to estimate the quality of each short-term forecasting model. Furthermore, Nash-Sutcliffe (NS) model efficiency coefficient proposed by Nash-Sutcliffe (1970), root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) are the forecasting statistical terms used to assess the predictive performance of the models. Lastly, as regards the selection of an accurate and appropriate STWD forecasting model, this paper provides recommendations and future work based on the forecasts generated by each of the predictive models considered.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Real-time dynamic hydraulic model for potable water loss reduction [J].
Abu-Mahfouz, Adnan M. ;
Hamam, Yskandar ;
Page, Philip R. ;
Djouani, Karim ;
Kurien, Anish .
12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HYDROINFORMATICS (HIC 2016) - SMART WATER FOR THE FUTURE, 2016, 154 :99-106
[2]   Comparison of Multivariate Regression and Artificial Neural Networks for Peak Urban Water-Demand Forecasting: Evaluation of Different ANN Learning Algorithms [J].
Adamowski, Jan ;
Karapataki, Christina .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2010, 15 (10) :729-743
[3]   NEW LOOK AT STATISTICAL-MODEL IDENTIFICATION [J].
AKAIKE, H .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1974, AC19 (06) :716-723
[4]   Water consumption prediction of Istanbul City by using fuzzy logic approach [J].
Altunkaynak, A ;
Özger, M ;
Çakmakci, M .
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2005, 19 (05) :641-654
[5]   Assessment of predictive uncertainty within the framework of water demand forecasting using the Model Conditional Processor (MCP) [J].
Alvisi, S. ;
Franchini, M. .
URBAN WATER JOURNAL, 2017, 14 (01) :1-10
[6]   A short-term, pattern-based model for water-demand forecasting [J].
Alvisi, Stefano ;
Franchini, Marco ;
Marinelli, Alberto .
JOURNAL OF HYDROINFORMATICS, 2007, 9 (01) :39-50
[7]   Short-term forecasting for urban water consumption [J].
Aly, AH ;
Wanakule, N .
JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 2004, 130 (05) :405-410
[8]  
Amponsah S.K., 2015, International Journal of Applied Mathematical Research, V4, P393, DOI DOI 10.14419/IJAMR.V4I2.3629
[9]  
Anele A., 2007, WATER RESOU IN PRESS
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1992, P IFIP WORK C DAGSCH