The Effect of Dialysis Chains on Mortality among Patients Receiving Hemodialysis

被引:39
作者
Zhang, Yi [1 ]
Cotter, Dennis J. [1 ]
Thamer, Mae [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Technol & Practice Patterns Inst MTPPI, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
Dialysis facility; mortality; chain; profit; STAGE RENAL-DISEASE; UNITED-STATES; HEALTH-CARE; FOR-PROFIT; PUBLIC-HEALTH; FACILITIES; SURVIVAL; OWNERSHIP; PROVIDERS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01219.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective To examine the association between dialysis facility chain affiliation and patient mortality. Study Setting Medicare dialysis population. Study Design Data from the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) were used to identify 3,601 free-standing dialysis facilities and 34,914 Medicare patients' incidence to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in 2004. Mixed-effect regression models were used to estimate patient mortality by dialysis facility chain and profit status during the 2-year follow-up. Data Collection USRDS data were matched with facility, cost, and census data. Principle Findings Of the five largest dialysis chains, the lowest mortality risk was observed among patients dialyzed at nonprofit (NP) Chain 5 facilities. Compared with Chain 5, hazard ratios were 19 percent higher (95 percent CI 1.06-1.34) and 24 percent higher (95 percent CI 1.10-1.40) for patients dialyzed at for-profit (FP) Chain 1 and Chain 2 facilities, respectively. In addition, patients at FP facilities had a 13 percent higher risk of mortality than those in NP facilities (95 percent CI 1.06-1.22). Conclusions Large chain affiliation is an independent risk factor for ESRD mortality in the United States. Given the movement toward further consolidation of large FP chains, reasons behind the increase in mortality require scrutiny.
引用
收藏
页码:747 / 767
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2020, USRDS 2020 Annual Data Report: Atlas of Chronic Kidney Disease and End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States
[2]  
[Anonymous], USRDS 2006 ANN DAT R
[3]   Most nephrologists are primary care providers for chronic dialysis patients: Results of a national survey [J].
Bender, FH ;
Holley, JL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 1996, 28 (01) :67-71
[4]   Statistical and substantive inferences in public health: Issues in the application of multilevel models [J].
Bingenheimer, JB ;
Raudenbush, SW .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2004, 25 :53-77
[5]   Effect of dialysis center profit-status on patient survival: A comparison of risk-adjustment and instrumental variable approaches [J].
Brooks, John M. ;
Irwin, Christopher P. ;
Hunsicker, Lawrence G. ;
Flanigan, Michael J. ;
Chrischilles, Elizabeth A. ;
Pendergast, Jane F. .
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2006, 41 (06) :2267-2289
[6]  
Byrne Colene, 1994, JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association), V271, P34, DOI 10.1001/jama.271.1.34
[7]   A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION [J].
CHARLSON, ME ;
POMPEI, P ;
ALES, KL ;
MACKENZIE, CR .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05) :373-383
[8]   Improving the statistical approach to health care provider profiling [J].
Christiansen, CL ;
Morris, CN .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1997, 127 (08) :764-768
[9]  
*CMS, 2009, DIAL FAC COMP
[10]   RELATION OF POOLED LOGISTIC-REGRESSION TO TIME-DEPENDENT COX REGRESSION-ANALYSIS - THE FRAMINGHAM HEART-STUDY [J].
DAGOSTINO, RB ;
LEE, ML ;
BELANGER, AJ ;
CUPPLES, LA ;
ANDERSON, K ;
KANNEL, WB .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1990, 9 (12) :1501-1515